75C - BAIL BOND FIRMS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I' I uses implemented under the proposed ordinance would be evaluated for potential impacts to utility service systems. XVI. MANDATORY FJ:NDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to el~inate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or el~inate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. No J:mpact The proposed ordinance would not have a direct impact on any plant or wildlife species or historical property in Santa Ana, in that the proposed ordinance would not involve any activities that would impact plant, wildlife or historic resources or degrade the quality of the environment. B. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? No J:mpac t Approval of the proposed ordinance would not result in any significant cumulative impacts, in that the proposed ordinance would not involve any activities that would result in cumulative impacts to the environment. C. Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly? No J:mpact Approval of the proposed ordinance would not cause any substantial adverse effects on human beings, in that the proposed ordinance would not involve any activities that would result in adverse effects to human beings or the environment. XVIJ:I. DETERMINATION Based upon the evidence in light of the whole record documented in the above evaluation and cited references, I find that the 7 SC~~1