My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75D - MERGER S.A. REDEVELOPMENT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
09/07/2004
>
75D - MERGER S.A. REDEVELOPMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:01:14 PM
Creation date
9/2/2004 1:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75D
Date
9/7/2004
Destruction Year
2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />(B) No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed Merger would not be in conflict <br />with Community Redevelopment Law, adopted redevelopment <br />plans or other relevant planning programs or policies in <br />the City. Futuré redevelopment activities proposed within <br />the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for consistency <br />with applicable redevelopment plans and other relevant <br />planning programs and policies. <br /> <br />(C) No Impact <br /> <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, <br />there are no habitat conservation plans or natural <br />community conservation plans established within the City of <br />Santa Ana. Therefore, approval and implementation of the <br />proposed Merger would not be in conflict with any habitat <br />conservation or natural community conservation plan. <br /> <br />VIII. <br /> <br />MINERAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />(A) <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR identifies <br />that there are no areas in Santa Ana that contain <br />significant Mineral Aggregate Resource Areas. Therefore, <br />approval and implementation of the proposed Merger would <br />not result in adverse impacts to any mineral resources. <br /> <br />IX. NOISE <br /> <br />(A.B.C.D) Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed Merger would not directly result <br />in any short-term or long-term noise impacts or excessive <br />groundborne vibration impacts. Though, future redevelopment <br />activities implemented within the Merged Project Area could <br />potentially result in or be subject to adverse noise <br />impacts. However, through the City's development review <br />process, future redevelopment activities implemented within <br />the Merged Project Area would be evaluated for potenti~l <br />noise impacts. Where needed, mitigation measures, such as <br />preparation of noise reports, incorporation of sound <br />attenuation measures and compliance with the City's Noise <br />Ordinance would be required to avoid or minimize potential <br />noise impacts. <br /> <br />Page 155 of 190 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />75D-165 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.