My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1972
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1972
>
11-20-1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:16 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 11:14:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
11/20/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL ~;310 - VA 72-74 - (Continued) <br /> <br />The Clerk reported no written communications had been received. <br /> <br />The following persons spoke /n favor of the appeal: <br /> <br />Mr. Ronald M~ Ward, 4329 Via Notre, Cypress <br />Mr. Tony Rivas, 14901 Dusk <br /> <br />Mr. Ward stated that the area is properly zone d M 1; that it is a blighted <br />area needing close guidance and direction in its future growth. <br /> <br />Mr. Rivas spoke on beha~ of his father, D. C. Rivas, owner of Rivas Foods, <br />a tortilla factory, located at 1924 Fourth Street, and on behalf of the owner <br />of three lots on the corner of Fourth and Raitt. He stated that the building <br />of residences in the area was a hardship on the business already situated there <br />because of noise abatement; that his father had relied upon the lvi 1 zoning long <br />ago and would not have built his factory at that location had he known zoning <br />might change; and that Iow-income residential development would not enhance <br />the value of his property. <br /> <br />Mr. Jim Miranda, 1917 Westwood, spoke in opposition to the appeal, stating' <br />that there was an extreme need for low-income housing in the city; that the <br />proposed residences are good pre-fab houses that have been approved at the <br />State level and by FHA; that Mr. Ward had been present when the Variance <br />Application had been approved; that the church adjacent to the property had <br />offered the property for sale because of vandalism on the property; that no <br />further industry would go into that area because it is not designed for industry. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson asked if Fourth Street would eventuaily go up to Fifth <br />Street. <br /> <br />The Director of Public Works responded that there were plans for the extension <br />of Fourth west of llaitt up to 17th Street, however, it was unknown if the rail- <br />road would relinquish their property for this purpose and that in any event the <br />extension would not be for five to ten years. <br /> <br />The Mayor closed the public hearing. Councilman Herrln's motion to uphold <br />the decision of the Planning Commission was seconded by Councilman Markel, <br />and carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />I-terrin, Markel, Villa, Evans, Griset, Paterson. <br />Yamamoto <br />None <br /> <br />AGENDA (~RDEI~ Councilman Patterson~ s motion to <br /> finish the afternoon agenda items <br /> was seconded by Councilman Evans <br />and %man/mously carried. Items 35, 56, 45, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 58, 59 and <br />60 were considered as the next order of business. <br /> <br />RES. 72-111 RESOLUTION 7z-lll CLAP, IFYING <br />CLARIFICATION OF RESOLUTION 71-53 REGARDING <br />RES. 71-53 STUDENT RECREATIONAL <br /> ACTIVITIES was adopted on <br />motion of Councilman I-Ierrin, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto and carried with <br />Councilman Evans voting NO. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />431 <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 20, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.