My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-02-1973
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1973
>
01-02-1973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 1:59:57 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 2:40:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/2/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Christeson spoke again on behalf of himself, stating tt%at he had <br />contributed much to the City in the way of capital improvements, including <br />construction of 22 developments, and that he .had a deep and warm spot <br />for the City; that he does business in Glendora, Pasadena, and other <br />cities that have su£fered from,the problem of decay in the old part of <br />their city because of suburbia; that it'was not the,downtown businessman's <br />fault when that happens; and that redevelopment agencies in other cities <br />have worked well. <br /> <br />After the motion but prior to voting, Councilman Herrin, stated that he <br />could not aupport the motion in that freedom was the mo~t important <br />ingredient,that human beings had ever had, and that it was difficult for <br />him to find that the public interest being served by the adoption of the <br />ordinance was more, important than the individual private ownership of <br />property. <br /> <br />Mayor Griset stated that the California State Redevelopment Act stated that <br />anyone .could own property in the area, but that no one could acquire <br />additional property after the project area had been established. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson stated that he was disappointed that the matter of <br />a conflict of interest continued to arise when it had been cleared with the <br />City Attorney; that several staunch pillars of the commtmity, h~ve told <br />Council that the City is declining and they have asked Council to do <br />something to help Santa A_ua; and that adoption of the ordinance is one <br />way to make Santa Ana,a winner. <br /> <br />ORD. NS-1150 Ordinance NS-1150 CREATING <br />COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT A COMMUNIT,Y REDEVELOP- <br />COMMISSION MENT COMMISSION FOR THE <br /> - CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT <br />TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW was placed on first reading <br />on motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto and <br />carried with Councitm~n Markel and Herrin dissenting. <br /> <br />APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS The following persons were <br />COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT appointed as members of <br />COMMISSION . , the Community Redevelop- <br /> merit Commission on motion <br />of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto and carried <br />with Councilmen Markel and Herrin, dissenting: <br /> <br /> Hector Godinez, 2118 South Birch Street <br /> Tom McMichael, 517 East Buffalo <br /> Donald Christeson, 1150 River Lane <br /> Waldo Haug, 827 North Westwood <br /> John W. (Bill) Hill, 1117 Concord <br />Ted Jesses, 1013 South Main Street <br />~Larry White, First American Title Co. <br /> <br />Fifth and Main <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 10 JANUARY 2, 1973 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.