My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-05-1973
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1973
>
02-05-1973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:02 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 2:42:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/5/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of all of the residents in the County lived within incorporated areas, that <br />50% of the Orange County Revenue Sharing Funds should be sh~red with <br />the cities; that it had come to his attention that the County may not go along <br />with this plan, or only consider some joint projects. He further stated that <br />in his opinion some priorities should be established; that open space or park <br />projects might be among the joint County or City projects. <br /> <br />The City Manager stated that the Orange County Managers had discussed <br />the matter and that the problem was one of timing in that the Board o£ <br />Supervisors hearing was scheduled for February 27, 1973; that he had <br />received a request from the County Administrative Officer asking cities <br />to submit their projects by February 1Z, 1973; and that they will in effect <br />be destroying the League position if projects are submitted. He suggested <br />that the County should be asked to go ahead and make a decision as to <br />whether or not they will approve the League's request for a 50/50 split; <br />that if they declined, then all cities would have adequate opportunity to <br />prepare and submit recommendations to the County for projects; that <br />he had been asking the Department Heads for suggestions of projects <br />which would appeal to the Board of Supervisors in that they would serve <br />people other than residents of the City; for example the Communications <br />Center, which serves Santa Ana, Orange and Tustin; that he understood <br />Costa Mesa was interested in a storm drain that would serve their indus- <br />trial area and the City of Santa Ana. <br /> <br />Councilman Villa stated that the County would be faced with, the problem <br />of logistics in that they would be getting approximately $11, 000, 000.00, <br />and there would be difficulty in proportioning the funds among the cities. <br /> <br />By informal unanimous consent, Council agreed that Councilman Patterson <br />should seek a postponement of the meeting scheduled for February 12, 1973. <br />(CA-57. <br /> <br />ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Councilman Herrin inquired <br />GREENBELT COMMITTEE as to the agreement regarding <br /> the Greenbelt Committee. He <br />stated that he had been asked to have an approval by Council to enter into <br />an agreement prior to April 1, 1973. <br /> <br />The Clerk stated that she had received no communication in her office <br />concerning the matter. <br /> <br />Councilman Herrin stated that Council should get the agreement well in <br />advance so that there would be ample time for study and discus'sion before <br />April 1. He stated that he would make sure all Council members received <br />copies of the pertinent material. (CA-145.1) <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />The meeting was adjourned by <br />the Vice Mayor at 10:00 P.M. <br /> <br />Florence I. Malone <br />Clerk of the Council <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 5, 1973 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.