Laserfiche WebLink
of all of the residents in the County lived within incorporated areas, that <br />50% of the Orange County Revenue Sharing Funds should be sh~red with <br />the cities; that it had come to his attention that the County may not go along <br />with this plan, or only consider some joint projects. He further stated that <br />in his opinion some priorities should be established; that open space or park <br />projects might be among the joint County or City projects. <br /> <br />The City Manager stated that the Orange County Managers had discussed <br />the matter and that the problem was one of timing in that the Board o£ <br />Supervisors hearing was scheduled for February 27, 1973; that he had <br />received a request from the County Administrative Officer asking cities <br />to submit their projects by February 1Z, 1973; and that they will in effect <br />be destroying the League position if projects are submitted. He suggested <br />that the County should be asked to go ahead and make a decision as to <br />whether or not they will approve the League's request for a 50/50 split; <br />that if they declined, then all cities would have adequate opportunity to <br />prepare and submit recommendations to the County for projects; that <br />he had been asking the Department Heads for suggestions of projects <br />which would appeal to the Board of Supervisors in that they would serve <br />people other than residents of the City; for example the Communications <br />Center, which serves Santa Ana, Orange and Tustin; that he understood <br />Costa Mesa was interested in a storm drain that would serve their indus- <br />trial area and the City of Santa Ana. <br /> <br />Councilman Villa stated that the County would be faced with, the problem <br />of logistics in that they would be getting approximately $11, 000, 000.00, <br />and there would be difficulty in proportioning the funds among the cities. <br /> <br />By informal unanimous consent, Council agreed that Councilman Patterson <br />should seek a postponement of the meeting scheduled for February 12, 1973. <br />(CA-57. <br /> <br />ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Councilman Herrin inquired <br />GREENBELT COMMITTEE as to the agreement regarding <br /> the Greenbelt Committee. He <br />stated that he had been asked to have an approval by Council to enter into <br />an agreement prior to April 1, 1973. <br /> <br />The Clerk stated that she had received no communication in her office <br />concerning the matter. <br /> <br />Councilman Herrin stated that Council should get the agreement well in <br />advance so that there would be ample time for study and discus'sion before <br />April 1. He stated that he would make sure all Council members received <br />copies of the pertinent material. (CA-145.1) <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />The meeting was adjourned by <br />the Vice Mayor at 10:00 P.M. <br /> <br />Florence I. Malone <br />Clerk of the Council <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 5, 1973 <br /> <br /> <br />