Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARING The Mayor opened the public <br />APPEAL #315 hearing on Appeal #315 filed <br />JOSEPH N. TURNER by 3oseph N. Turner appeal- <br /> ing standard Planning <br />requirements 7 and 8 of the Zoning Administrator's Report on Minor <br />Exception 73-5, requiring that the business remain a bona fide eating <br />establishment as defined by the Alcoholic Beverage Control and there <br />be n? gaming .devices, such as pool tables, pinball machines, motion <br />picture booth, st etc., at a restaurant to be constructed at 2527 South <br />Main Street, and asked for a staff report. <br /> <br />The Planning Director stated that neither the applicant, Cal Enterprises, <br />nor the proposed lessee and appella~nt, Joseph N. Turner, had attended <br />the Zoning Administrator's hearing, and that the Minor Exception had <br />been granted with the usual standard conditions; that subsequent to the <br />hearing, it was brought to the Zoning Administrator's attention that five <br />or six pool tables were desired and that the establishment would not be <br />a bona fide eating establishment as defined by the Alcoholic Beverage <br />Control Law. <br /> <br />Wilfred W. Steiner, Attorney for the appellant, 880 East Colorado <br />Boulevard, Pasadena, spoke in favor of the appeal, stating that his client <br />was not intending a topless or bottomless type of operation; that the <br />restaurant would specialize in a line of excellent sandwiches at low <br />prices; that his client had six existing establishments of that type in <br />other areas that were good, clean, well-run establishments. <br /> <br />In response to questions from Council, the appellant, Joseph N. Turner, <br />stated that he was applying to ABC for a Public Premises license and <br />that the difference between a bona fide restaurant and public premises <br />as defined by ABC was that with a bona fide restaurant, the establishment <br />is required to carry breakfast, lunch and dinner items; that his proposed <br />establishment would carry only sandwiches as opposed to lunches and <br />dinners; that griddle sandwiches were prepared from lh00 A.M. to <br />2:00 P.M.; but that sandwiches were available for z0 hours per day; <br />that if the demand war~anted it, they would serve evening food from <br />5:00 to 8:00 P.M. three or four n. ights a week. <br /> <br />Councilman Villa's motion to grant the appeal and instruct the City <br />Attorney to prepare the appropriate resolution was seconded by Council- <br />man Evans, and carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Villa, Evans, Herrin, Patterson <br />Griset, Yamamoto, Markel <br />None <br /> <br />Prior to voting, Councilman Yamamoto stated that he could not support <br />the motion because it would allow a liquor establishment within 300 feet <br />of a residential district. <br /> <br />Mayor Griset stated that he would vote against the motion~for the same <br />reason. <br /> <br />Councilman Evans inquired as to what type of gaming devices were proposed <br />at the restaurant, and the appellant responded that they intended to put <br />in only coin operated cigarette machines and coin operated pool tables. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 77 MARCH tZ, 1973 <br /> <br /> <br />