Laserfiche WebLink
It was the consensus of those opposing the motion that they could <br />see no difference between a restaurant at the proposed location <br />which would not require a Conditional Use Permit, and a theater <br />playhouse as far as any effect it may have on the surrounding <br />industries; that the establishment would bring in revenues to <br />the City; and would contribute to the general well-being of <br />the community. <br /> <br />During the discussion, concern was expressed abou~ the helicopter <br />landing pad on the roof of the warehouse and the possibility <br />of the establishment changing from plays to less desirable types <br />of entertainment. <br /> <br />Mr. Kendall stated that the rights to the landing pad were being <br />reserved by the landlord, however, it was not anticipated that <br />there would be any great use of it; that if a problem developed, <br />the landlord had advised that they would be willing to forego <br />its use. <br /> <br />With regard to the possibility of changing types of entertainment, <br />Mr. Kendall stated that as far as the landlord and appellant <br />were concerned, there was no intent to do so. <br /> <br />At the request of Councilman Evans, the Planning Director read <br />into the record the letter addressed to the Planning Commission <br />from C. J. Segerstrom dated September 24, 1973, stating his <br />opposition to the Conditional Use Permit. (CA 13.3) <br /> <br />RECESS <br /> <br />present. <br /> <br />At 9:30 P.M., a recess <br />was declared. Council <br />reconvened at 9:42 P.M. <br />with all Council members <br /> <br />SWEARING IN CEREMONY <br /> <br />Waldo Haug was sworn in <br />by the Clerk of the Council <br />as a new member of the <br />Personnel Board. (CA 50.8) <br /> <br />PROPERTY MAINTENANCE Council considered the <br />ORDINANCE report of the Director <br /> of Building Safety dated <br /> October 8, 1973, relating <br />to the proposed Property Maintenance Ordinance. The proposed <br />ordinance had been continued from the Council meeting of August <br />20, 1973, with staff direction to circulate it to various <br />community groups in order to obtain ideas and recommendations. <br /> <br />The Mayor stated that he was of the opinion that there had not <br />been enough input from the community to make a decision on the <br />ordinance that evening, and that Council might consider another <br />continuance of the item, possibly for consideration during a <br />study session. <br /> <br />Councilman Griset concurred with the Mayor; Councilman Ward stated <br />that he was concerned with the lack of enforcement of existing <br />ordinances relative to the subject. <br /> <br />Alex Acevedo, 207 E. Fourth, requested that Council continue the <br />matter because of the pending Logan Area Study and the possible <br />zone changes that might result. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 385 OCTOBER 15, 1973 <br /> <br /> <br />