09-09-1974 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Markel and unanimously carried: RESOLUTION NO. 74-145 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING MAP AND DECLARING INTENTION TO ABANDON A TWENTY-FOOT EASEMENT LOCATED BETWEEN COLUMBINE STREET AND SHERWOOD STREET. (CA 14) RESOLUTION NO. 74~146 The following resolu- APPLICATION FOR GRANT tion was adopted on PARAPROFESSIONAL RESPONSE TEAM motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, and unanimously carried: RESOLUTION NO. 74-146 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS TO THE U.S. DEPART- MENT OF JUSTICE TO CREATE A PARAPROFESSIONAL RESPONSE TEAM, AND AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO SIGN AND DELIVER THE APPLICATION. (CA 140.19; CA 47; CA 64) REQUEST FOR ZONING The letter received COOPERATION BETWEEN CITY August 30, 1974, from & CITY OF COSTA MESA Kathleen Marie Linn, requesting adoption of a resolution proposing mutual agreement between Santa Ana and the City of Costa Mesa, regarding rezoning of property in Costa Mesa immediately south of the Santa Aha South Coast Shores development, located on the north side of Wakeham, westerly of Bear, was referred to Staff on motion of Council- man Evans, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, and carried. The motion included an amendment by Councilman Griset, seconded by Councilman Evans, and unanimously carried, which directed Mayor Patterson to forward a letter to the City Council of Costa Mesa expressing concern with the density of the proposed re-zoning and the sufficiency of the Environmental Impact Report. (CA 10.2) PROPOSAL FOR BONUS The report dated TO PROPERTY OWNERS FOR August 30, 1974, from REDUCTION IN PARKING the Director of Plan- ning, referring to Councilman Ward's memorandum regarding parking reduction incentives, was received by Council. On motion of Councilman Ward, seconded by Councilman Evans, and unanimously carried, Council approved Staff recommendation that: (i) The parking program within the Redevelopment Project Area be developed before Staff considers the City as a whole. It is timely to impact this plan, particularly when the consultants are in the regulation draft portion of the study, and we are considering the magnitude of the multimodal facility; Staff continue developing parking programs for other zones as is being done for the industrial area; (3) As E.P.A. develops more specific criteria for evaluating projects involving parking facilities of 250 spaces or more, Staff should consider these criteria when developing new parking requirements. (CA 18.7) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 331 SEPTEMBER 9, 1974