|
EMPLOYEE RESIDENCE
<br />REQUIREMENT
<br />
<br />employee residence requirement, was
<br />
<br /> The letter dated Sept-
<br /> ember 4, 1974, from the
<br /> Chairman of the Personnel
<br /> Board, pertaining to
<br />received by Council.
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Garthe, seconded by Councilman Ward,
<br />with dissenting vote by Councilman Yamamoto, Council directed
<br />that the matter be held in abeyance until after the November
<br />election. (CA 50)
<br />
<br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATING Memorandum dated Sept-
<br />COUNCIL RESOLUTION SERVICE ember 11, 1974, from
<br /> the City Attorney, and
<br /> letters dated July 1,
<br />1974, and August 22, 1974, with attachments from the Chair-
<br />man, Legislative Liaison Advisory Committee, ICC, regarding
<br />resolution service for Orange County cities were received
<br />by Council.
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Ward, seconded by Councilman Griset,
<br />and unanimously carried, Council directed the City Clerk
<br />to forward to the ICC Executive Director all resolutions of
<br />the City of Santa Ana expressing a policy, or position, taken
<br />by the City on any issue of local, state, or nationwide
<br />concern which may affect, or be of possible interest to
<br />most Orange County cities and the County of Orange.
<br />
<br />(CA 112.13b)
<br />
<br />ABATEMENT OF VEHICLE
<br />MR. G. NERISON
<br />
<br />from the Police
<br />owned by Mr. G.
<br />by Council.
<br />
<br />Reports dated Sept-
<br />ember 4, 1974, and
<br />September 11, 1974,
<br />with attachments,
<br />Chief, regarding abatement of vehicle
<br />Nerison, 1008 North Jackson, were received
<br />
<br />Mr. Dale Elsberry, Attorney at Law, 517 North Bristol,
<br />representing Mr. G. Nerison, stated that the statutes
<br />and ordinances are not applicable in this case because
<br />the car was in good shape and improvements had been
<br />made on it with new parts and tires, and that the pur-
<br />pose of the ordinance is to abate a nuisance; that the
<br />motor had been removed and that Mr. Nerison was looking
<br />for a place to store it; and he had so informed Officer
<br />Flannery. He further stated that the Notice had nothing
<br />in it to indicate that the vehicle would be destroyed.
<br />He requested Council to consider payment to Mr. Nerison
<br />for damages, in the amount of $3,000, which can be sub-
<br />stantiated by invoices and receipts for parts and improve-
<br />ments on the car. He considered the '58 DeSoto a classic
<br />car.
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Griset, seconded by Councilman
<br />Yamamoto, and carried, with dissenting vote by Council-
<br />man Markel, Council denied the appeal. (CA 11.3)
<br />
<br />CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE Memorandums dated
<br />PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT September 4 and
<br /> September 6, 1974,
<br /> from the Director of
<br />Personnel regarding partial reimbursement request to defray
<br />expenses to the International Association of Chiefs of Police
<br />
<br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 350 SEPTEMBER 16, 1974
<br />
<br />
<br />
|