My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 2100 S. BRISTOL ST.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
02/07/2005
>
31A - 2100 S. BRISTOL ST.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:58:47 PM
Creation date
2/1/2005 12:31:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
2/7/2005
Destruction Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />H. <br /> <br />indicated that it is feasible <br />facilities within the project <br />adequately drain the proposed <br /> <br />that existing <br />area would be <br />project. <br /> <br />drainage <br />able to <br /> <br />F. <br /> <br />Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped <br />on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance <br />Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> <br />G. <br /> <br />Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped <br />on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance <br />Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> <br />Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which <br />would impede or redirect flood flows? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the Flood Rate Insurance Map 0602320257H, the <br />project site is located within Flood Zone X and not subject <br />to 100-year flood risks. Implementation of the proposed <br />project would not increase the risk of flooding. <br /> <br />J. <br /> <br />K. <br /> <br />Result in significant alteration of receiving <br />quality during or following construction. <br /> <br />water <br /> <br />Could the proposed project result in increased erosion <br />downstream? <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />The majority of the construction operations for the <br />proposed project would be interior tenant improvements. <br />Construction activities would not involve any earthwork <br />operations that would uncover soils that would facilitate <br />potential soil erosion. Additionally, the potential for <br />construction operations to degrade storm water runoff would <br />be minimal. <br /> <br />IX. LAND USE/PLANNING <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Physically divide an established community? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed project would not physically divide any <br />established community, in that no existing residential uses <br />are located on the project site. The proposed project would <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />3~1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.