My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - 2775 N. MAIN ST.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
02/07/2005
>
75B - 2775 N. MAIN ST.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:59:09 PM
Creation date
2/2/2005 1:29:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75B
Date
2/7/2005
Destruction Year
2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />EIR No. 2004-01; ZOA No. 2004-06; <br />DA No. 2004-04; CUP No. 2004-28; <br />VTTM No. 2004-06; and SPR No. 2004-05 <br />December 13, 2004 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />For reference and review is the original staff report dated October 25, <br />2004 (Exhibit 12), responses to Planning Commission comments, staff <br />modifications and the following revised documents: Specific Development <br />59, Development Agreement 2004-04 and Conditions of Approval. In <br />addition, the public comments received on the Draft Environmental Impact <br />Report and written responses to those comments have been included. The <br />applicant has also supplemented its submittal with an architectural <br />booklet dated December 6, 2004 Exhibit 13 and a matrix (Exhibit 14) <br />outlining changes from the architectural booklet dated August 23, 2004 <br />that the applicant submitted for the Commission's review in the last <br />study session concerning the project. The applicant has provided a copy <br />of the project's development schedule (Exhibit 15). <br /> <br />Planning Commission Comments <br /> <br />In response to the Planning Commission's October 25, 2004 hearing, staff <br />has summarized the Commission comments in the list below. The <br />underlined areas identify issues or section numbers raised by the <br />Planning Commission followed by staff responses. <br /> <br />. Specific Development Zone: <br /> <br />Page 4, Item 1. b. Allowed <br />Staff concurs that office uses <br />active commercial center as <br />proposed SD has been revised to <br /> <br />uses include general offices. <br />would not be appropriate in an <br />envisioned. Therefore, the <br />prohibit these uses. <br /> <br />Page 5, Item 1. d. Cafes and restaurants. Staff <br />strengthening the provision by requiring that <br />restaurants incorporate sit-down dining areas and <br />service. These changes have been incorporated into <br /> <br />recommends <br />cafes and <br />full table <br />the SD. <br /> <br />Page 8, Item A. 6. Conditional use permit requirement for <br />parking structures. This item is included to accommodate <br />potential future parking needs. Though no parking structure <br />is proposed at present, a future high-rise residential tower <br />may require one. Requiring a conditional use permit for such <br />a future parking structures will enable Planning Commission <br />and City Council to review it in its context and either <br />approve, conditionally approve or delay the proposal. <br /> <br />758-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.