Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Department, Department of Public Works, and Orange <br />County Mosquito Abatement District; and that all of the <br />comments received had been attached to the report. <br /> <br />He further stated that the Environmental Impact Report addresses <br />itself to a thorough review of the existing environment in the <br />area and to the impact; that no long term impact is anticipated; <br />that there would be a short term negative effect due to con- <br />struction, i.e. noise and dust; and that benefits would include <br />traffic circulation in the area. <br /> <br />In conclusion, he stated that as specific developments occur <br />in the amended Project Area, each one would have to undergo <br />the Environmental Impact process, inasmuch as this report dealt <br />only with the Plan amendment itsel£. <br /> <br />The written comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report <br />were received and filed, on the unanimously approved (5-0) <br />motion of Councilman Brandt, seconded by Councilman Ward. <br /> <br />Mayor Garthe invited testimony from the public in favor of the <br />E.I.R.; there was no response. <br /> <br />Councilman Bricken noted that certain changes to the E.I.R. <br />would be necessary because of the previously adopted changes <br />to the amendment, and he cited Page 52, Item 6, and Page 15, <br />second paragraph, as examples. The Executive Director stated <br />that the wording would be changed throughout:the E,I.R. to <br />make it consistent with the changes to the amendment, and he <br />further stated that the changes would not substantially change <br />the Environmental Impact Report. <br /> <br />Mr. Thomas White, 413 West Roe Street, asked if the Agency <br />relocation benefits wore commensurate with the State policy. <br />Mayor Garthe responded that they were in:conformance with the <br />State law. <br /> <br />Mrs. Garcia, representing Mrs. Valenzuela, 1051 West Third <br />Street, was advised by Special Counsel that 1051 West Third <br />Street was not a part of the new area now under discussion, <br />but was included in the Project Area already adopted a year <br />or so ago, <br /> <br />The~e were no other proponents or opponents, and the Mayor <br />closed the Public Hearing. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 75-15 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDBVELOP- <br />MBNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ADOPTING AND CERTIFYING <br />THE BNVIRONY~ENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOP- <br />M~NT PLAN, CITY OF SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DATED <br />APRIL 2, 1975, was adopted on the<unanimously approved (S-0) <br />motion of Commissioner Bricken, seconded by Commissioner <br />Ward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bricken stipulated, with the consont of the second, <br />that the motion include the changes suggested by the.Council to <br />tSe E.I'.R. in conformance with the changes in the:amendment as <br />adopted earlier. CA 82.10 <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />AMENDMENT TO THE <br />REDEVELOPMENT PLAN <br />ORDINANCE NO. NS-12S8 <br /> <br />Redevelopment Project, <br /> <br /> Mayor Garthe,opened <br /> the Public Hearing on <br /> the amendment to.the <br /> Redevelopment Plan for <br />the City of Santa Ana <br />including the proposed changes to the <br /> <br />amendment, and ORDINANCE NS-1258, adopting.the amendment to <br />the Kedevelopment Plan. In addition he opened the Hearing for <br />comments on the report on the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />211 MAY 15, 1975 <br /> <br /> <br />