11-03-1975 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Negative Declaration was approved and filed and the following Resolution No. 75-158 was adopted, on the motion of Councilman Brandt, seconded by Councilman Bricken and carried (4-3) with Councilmen Ward, Evans and Yamamoto dissenting: RESOLUTION NO. 75-158 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AFFIRM- ING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON VARIANCE APPLICATION NO. 75-52, APPROVING SAID VARIANCE APPLICATION FILED BY JAMES LUKENS. CA 13.3a PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL NO. 358 Mayor Garthe announced EIR 74-6 - VARIANCE APPLICATION that this was the time 75-50 and place for the public hearing on Appeal No. 358, filed by Lee M. Kearney, President of Citizens for Fair Housing Association, opposing the Planning Commission approval of Variance Application 75-50 and its certification and adoption of Envirnmental Impact Report 74-6 as the City's Final Environmental Impact Report for the Lake Dianne Project (Variance 75-50). The purpose of the variance is to allow parking and portions of two-story apartment build- ings in the Ri District and two-story apartment buildings within 150' of property zoned Ri on Assessor's Parcel No. 62-371-1 located at Dianne and Fruit Streets. The variance application was filed by Parkcenter Corporation. Mr. William Daugherty, Senior Planner, stated that the subject property has a combination of zones; that it is zoned R4 with a 100-foot deep buffer strip abutting Fruit Street; that the EIR addressed itself to an apartment complex of 314 units with a proposed density of 25.8 units per acre. Mr. Daugherty stated further that Mrs. Kearney's written request to the Planning Commission for a continuance on the variance to allow her to further review the matter and to recover from an illness was denied by the Planning Commission at its October 14 meeting. Following Council discussion, Councilman Bricken moved to refer the EIR and VA 75-50 back to the Planning Commission for a re-hearing of the public testimony at a time when both the applicant and the people in the community can present their case and to authorize the return of the $125 appeal filing fee to the appellant. The motion was seconded by Councilman Ortiz, and unanimously (7-0) carried. Prior to the vote on the motion, Mr. Robert Davis, So. Brookhollow Drive, representing Parkcenter Corporation, stated that he did not object to the motion in view of Council's concern. CA 13.3 PUBLIC HEARING - NEGATIVE Mayor Garthe announced DECLARATION AND AMENDMENT that this was the time APPLICATION 730 and place for the public hearing of the Negative Declaration and Amendment Application 730 initiated by the Planning Commission to rezone property from Ri (Single Family Residence) District to the O (Open Space Land) District, and amending sectional district map 6-5-9; that the property is CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 468 NOVEMBER 3, 1975