Laserfiche WebLink
to allow Councilmen the opportunity to interview the appli- <br />cant, if they wish to do so, prior to Council action. CA 52.2 <br /> <br />Councilman.Ward expressed.the desire to interview the <br />candidate before the appointment is made; and Councilman <br />Bricken suggested that all Councilmen be provided with the <br />materials reviewed by the selection Committee. <br /> <br />ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE Council affirmed the <br />APPLICATION - TEFERTILLBR Staff recommendation <br />APPROVED RECOMMENDATION to protest the follow- <br /> ing Application, on <br />motion of Councilman Bricken, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, <br />and carried (4:2), with Councilman Ortiz dissenting: <br /> <br />TEFERTILLER, Carol M. and Jack - 1238 <br />E. Edinger Ave. - Original - Type "42" <br />On Sale Beer & Wine (Public Premises) <br />PROTEST - Police. <br /> <br />CA 146.1 <br /> <br />Prior to the motion, Police Chief Raymond Davis explained <br />that because of the high concentration of ABC licensed pre- <br />mises and police-related incidents in the area, and in <br />accordance with Council policy, the protest had been lodged. <br /> <br /> Mr. Richard Deneber, 1666 North Main Street, attorney for <br /> the owner-landlord of the establishment known as the Half <br /> Crown located at 1238 East Edinger Avenue, asked Council <br /> to withdraw its protest of the ABC application for a Type <br /> "42" On Sale Beer & Wine license. He stated that there had <br /> been a liquor license at the location for ten years, and <br /> that due to a technicality involving a time lapse a new <br />ABC application was necessary instead of a transfer applica- <br />tion; that the applicant had operated a business in Orange <br />~with a good reputation and few police problems; that the <br />owner would experience great financial difficulty if the <br />ABC license were not granted because of the Police protest. <br /> <br />Mr. Deneber emphasized that the ABC application was not for <br />a new license and is actually a transfer. Councilman <br />Bricken stated for the record that if a protest were war- <br />ranted, it would be issued regardless-of whether the applica- <br />tion was a new request or a transfer request. <br /> <br />READING WAIVED <br /> <br />man Bricken, Council waived <br />and resolutions, the titles <br />Agenda, <br /> <br /> On the unanimously <br /> approved (6:0) motion <br /> of Councilman Ward, <br /> seconded by Council- <br /> full reading of all ordinances <br /> of which appeared on the public <br />and consideration was given by title only. <br /> <br />NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~ <br />ORD. NS-1301 - INDUSTRIAL USE Councilman Ward's <br />DISTRICTS - APPROVED; 1ST RBADING motion, seconded by <br /> Councilman Bricken, <br /> to approve and file <br />Negative Declaration 75-180, place the following ordinance <br />on first reading, and set the matter for public hearing on <br />April S, 1976, carried unanimously ~:0): <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />108 <br /> <br />MARCH 22, 1976 <br /> <br /> <br />