05-03-1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

rear access (south); and 2) that no provision for drainage from his land was provided; and that the developer of the proposed tract has indicated that he will provide drainage and a sewer line to Mr. McDaniel's property. Arthur Aune, 2333 North Broadway, Attorney representing Mr. McDaniel, stated that his client would prefer to see Rene Drive extended northerly to Pomona; that he had been told by a gentleman in the Building Department that the only way it could work would be to run Rene generally easterly, which would affect the northerly and westerly portion of his client's property even more adversely; that he had talked with Hugh Foreman, representing the owner and developer, and if Council will not consider the extension of Rene Street to Pomona, then he would accept the developer's assurance that drainage and sewer problems would be taken care of. Hugh Foreman, representing the owners and developers of the proposed tract, stated that they had agreed to provide a sewer and outlet drainage for Mr. McDaniel's property; that Mr. McDaniel had previously owned a much larger parcel and had subdivided it, leaving himself with the present parcel, with which he claims to have difficulties; that Mr. McDaniel had declined to sell his property to Mr. Lukens. Don Watson, 1622 West Occidental, stated that he had a drainage problem also. Mr. Foreman responded that they were planning to use an asphalt ditch to drain Mr. Watson's property down to Rene as part of the development of the tract. Mr. Aune stated that. Mr. Foreman indicates all of the problems have been solved; that it is apparent there are some serious problems that exist; that further consideration of the over- all development of the general area is merited; and that he urged Council to consider it in that light. There being no further speakers, Mayor Garthe closed the Public Hearing. On the motion of Councilman Bricken, seconded by Councilman Brandt, the City Attorney was directed to prepare a Resolution affirming the decision of~the Planning Commission approving CUP 76-8 and: denying.Appeal No. 562 of Ira F. McDaniel, unanimously carried (7:D). NEGATIVE DECLARATION & Negative Declaration TRACT MAP 9046 - LUKENS 76-49, continued from APPROVED; F~LED the Consent Calendar, was approved and filed~ and the following Tract Map was approved subject to the conditions contained in .the Planning Director's Report, on the motion of Councilman Brandt, seconded by Councilman Bricken, and carried (7:0): NEGATIVE DECLARATION & TRACT MAP NO. 9046 Filed on March 15, 1976 by James A. and Florence.B. Lukens creaIing 84 R1-PRD lots; all proposed lots to,be used for single : family residences; generally located on the east side of Raitt Street, 657 feet south of Edinger Avenue. CA 24 Ronald Wolford, Assistant City Manager, in response to a question by Councilman Bricken, stated that Conditions number 4, 8, 16 and 17 to Tract Map No. 9046 covered the problems previously discussed concerning the drainage. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 179 MAY 3, 1976