06-21-1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

nized warrants; that from the present list, nine signals are being recommended by the Traffic Division for inclusion in the 1976-77 Budget; that Number 6 on the list, Main and Sunflower is not being recommended in favor of those intersections that will enable the City to complete arterial thoroughfares. Mr. Gerald Lance, Assistant Superintendent of the Santa Ana Unified School District, representing the Board of Education ~resent~d an excerpt from the Board's April 27 minutes request- lng a signal at the intersection of McFadden and Center Streets. Councilman Yamamoto stated that students from three schools use the intersection of McFadden and Newhope. In answer to Councilman Bricken's question, Joe Foust stated that the Council could select intersections for signalization as long as they meet the minimum war~ants, or they could appropriate a larger budget to install mor~ signals. When asked which signal installations would have to ~e deferred to the next Budget if McFadden and Newhope and McFadden and Center Street were included in this year's Budget, his rDsponse was Segerstrom and Raitt (No. 8) and Fairview and Altbn (No. 5). ! Councilman Brandt pointed ou~ that Segerstrom and Raitt served several schools and has a very significant traffic problem. He also asked if there were plaDs for the intersection of MacArthur and Greenville where there iS a real problem. Mr. Foust stated that there were site maintenance problems, lack of lighting at night, and that the location On the motion .of Councilman and carried [5:0) unanimousl for installation in the 1976 ment were approved with the Newhope replace No. 8, Seger A subsequent motion by Counc Nard, and carried C5:0) unan to include in the upcoming E section of McFadden and'Cent PUBLIC HEARING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 240 (SILVER ACRES) - CONTINUED or objections to the propose improvements, together with and all matters relating to Acres]. City Attorney, Kaith Gow, in that Resolution No. 76-64 p~ b_earing must carry by a 4/5 that as there are only five hear the speakers who are he the public,hearing until Su] be concluded; that in the me will be advised that they mu record of this proceeding in Deputy City Manager David Ts was requested by a number of cess of 50% of the land ares City accepted the petition s counsel and an engineering f cations; that the estimated CITY COUNCIL MINUTES is not a good place for a signal. Ward, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, y, the traffic signals recommended -7 7 Budget by the Public Works Depart- exception that No. 10, McFadden and strom and Raitt. ilman Bricken, seconded by Councilman imously, instructed the City Manager udget a traffic signal for the inter- er, No. 12 on the priority list. CA 18.3 CA 65B Mayor Garthe announced that this was the time and place fixed,by the City Council for the hearing of protests d construction of certain street appurtenances and appurtenant work Assessment District No. 240 (Silver terrupted the proceedings to announce epared for consideration after this vote, or six affirmative votes; Councilmen present, the Council could re to address the Council, hold open y 6, at which time the hearing could antime Councilmen Ortiz and Evans st familiarize themselves with the order to vote on July 6. zco announced the Assessment District property owners representing in ex- ; that on November 17, 1975, the ~d the services of special legal irm for design of plans and specifi- construction cost is $289,300; that 235 JUNE 21, 1976