Laserfiche WebLink
in conjunction with the widening of Seventeenth Street; that <br />the District is a 175 foot strip just westerly of King Street <br />to easterly of College; that the purpose of the District is <br />to remove all overhead wires and power poles and telephone <br />poles so that the arterial streets will be free of the usual <br />canopy of wires; that the utility companies are required to <br />underground their services at no cost to the City; the cost <br />of this project is about $170,000; that the total cost to <br />the adjacent property owners to connect to the new service <br />will be $10,650; that every property owner who will incur a <br />cost has been notified of the estimated cost of connecting; <br />and that there has been one person in opposition to the <br />District, Emile Goubert. <br /> <br />Mayor Garthe asked for speakers in opposition to the Under- <br />ground Utility District. <br /> <br />mr. Emile Goubert stated that the undergrounding would not bene- <br />fit him; that the only benefit is for the City; and that he did <br />not want to pay for it. <br /> <br />There being no further speakers, Mayor Garthe closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />On the motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Ward, <br />and carried unanimously (7:0), the following resolution was <br />adopted: <br /> <br /> REsOLuTION NO. 76-69 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND <br /> UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER 15. CA 154 <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING CHARTER Mayor Garthe announced <br />REVISION RECOMMENDATIONS that this was the <br />NOVEMBER B~LLOT RBQUB~TED time and place <br /> for the public <br />hearing of the recommendations of the Charter Review Committee <br />for amendment of the City Charter. <br /> <br />Mr. ~aldo Haug, Chairman of the Charter Review Committee, <br />announced that the Committee recommended 48 proposed revisions <br />and that they be presented to the voters as separate measures <br />except for combinations that would provide legal continuity. <br />In response to a question from Councilman Bricken, he further <br />stated that the procedure followed was to consider each section <br />recommended for change by the Council, Staff, and Committee <br />members, and to give tentative approval; that each measure was <br />later given final approval after discussion and public hear- <br />ing; that the Committee suggests that the measures go on the <br />November ballot because of the greater voter participation in <br />a national election, but that there may be some revisions that <br />could wait until a later election. <br /> <br />Councilman Ortiz, noting that some of the votes were not <br />unanimous, asked why the opinions of the dis. senting voters <br />were not given; that he wished to know why they voted as <br />they did. <br /> <br />Mr. Haug responded that the minutes show the discussion that <br />preceded each vote, and reflected the views of the minority <br />opinion. <br /> <br />Mayor Garthe asked if there would be arguments for land <br />against each measure. Clerk of the Council Florence Malone <br />responded that the Council may choose to present the argu- <br />ments both for and against, or it can ask others to prepare <br />such arguments. · <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />255 <br /> <br />JULY 6, 1976 <br /> <br /> <br />