My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-16-1976
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1976
>
08-16-1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 1:59:09 PM
Creation date
5/7/2003 2:29:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/16/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Prior to the following motions, Councilman Brandt asked for <br />a recess to determine whether some negotiations between the <br />Appellant and the residents could result in some settlement <br />of the complaints. <br /> <br />RECESS At 10:07 P.M. Mayor <br /> Pro Tem Yamamoto <br /> declared a recess; <br /> the meeting was <br />reconvened at 10:20 P.M., and Mr. Chaffin announced that <br />no agreement had been reached. Ail Council members were <br />present for the continuation of the foregoing public hearing <br />following the recess except Mayor Garthe, Vice Mayor Evans, <br />and Councilman Bricken. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) The Negative Deelara- <br />APPEAL NO. 368 - VA 76-58 tion was approved and <br />CLASSIC DEVELOPMENT - DENIED filed; Appeal No. 368 <br /> was denied; and the <br />City Attorney was directed to prepare the implementing <br />resolution, on the unanimously carried (4:0) motion of <br />Councilman Brandt, seconded by Councilman Ortiz. Subsequent <br />to this motion, an amendment to extend the Variance for 90 <br />days was moved by Councilman Ortiz, seconded by Mayor Pro <br />Tem Yamamoto, but later withdrawn with the consent of the <br />second after the recess. CA 13.3 <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING After the announcement by <br />APPEAL NO. 369 - VA 76-32 the Clerk of the Council, <br />CONTINUED Florence I. Malone, that <br /> a letter had been received <br />from the Appellant's representative requesting a continuance <br />of Appeal No. 369, filed by Jo Anne Elz, 850 South Main Street, <br />of Planning Commission denial of Variance Application 76-52 to <br />allow auto repair work in the open at 628-650 South Main Street, <br />the matter was continued to September 7, 1976, at 7:50 P.M., <br />on the unanimously approved (4:0) motion of Councilman Ortiz, <br />seconded by Councilman Brandt. CA <br /> <br />Councilman Bricken rejoined the Council meeting at 10:$0 P.M, <br /> <br />CONDEMNATION HEARING - 17TH ST. Prior tO the discussion <br />A.P. 596-221-38 1701 N. LINWOOD of this matter, <br />CONTINUED the property owner of <br /> 1701 North Linwood, north <br />side of Seventeenth Street between Santiago and Wright Streets, <br />was asked if he cared to return to the next Council meeting <br />when more Councilmen would be present. Mr. Kam Yee~ owner of <br />the property, stated that he has a busy schedule, and would <br />prefer to give his testimony in the hearing at this time. <br /> <br />Thereupon, Mayor Pro Tem Yamamoto announced that this was the <br />time and place'for the hearing of the condemnation of property <br />owned by Mr. Kam Yee located on the north side of Seventeenth <br />Street between Santiago and Wright Streets, one parcel only. <br /> <br />Public Works Director John Stevens stated that the subject <br />property is necessary to accommodate the proposed widening <br />of Seventeenth Street between Santiago and Wright Streets, <br />which is a presently budgeted project; that it is proposed <br />to take twelve feet of the Yee property at the corner of <br />Seventeenth and Linwood for street purposes; that Seventeenth <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 518 AUGUST 16, 1976 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.