Laserfiche WebLink
A speaker opposed to the change in the present ordinance and <br />favoring three dogs per household was: <br /> <br />D. L. Van Gordon, 1520 West Occidental <br /> <br />Mr. Van Gordon stated that he didn't think there was much <br />difference between two or three dogs; that only 55 residences <br />registered a third dog; that persons over the age of 65 <br />should be able to retain their pets free of charge. <br /> <br />There being no further speakers, Mayor Garthe closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />On the motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Councilman <br />Ward and carried (6:0) unanimously, the City Attorney was <br />directed to prepare an ordinance limiting dogs per household <br />to two with three exceptions: 1) third dogs that are presently <br />licensed may be kept until the residents move from Santa Aha <br />er they no longer have the dogs;:i~) a third dog that is moved <br />to Santa Ana from an ~nge County city that allows three dogs <br />may be licensed and maintained; and 5) oallowances for a third <br />dog to be boarded temporarily. CA 95 <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING - ORD. NS-1514 Mayor Garthe announced <br />BINGO GAMES - 2ND READING; ADOPTED that this was the time <br />RESOLUTION SETTING FEE ORDERED and place for the public <br /> hearing of Ordinance <br />No. NS-1514 allowing and regulating bingo games in the City of <br />Santa Aha. <br /> <br />City Attorney Keith Gow reported that a first draft of the <br />ordinance has been prepared in response to requests made <br />before the Council some time ago following the adoption of <br />Proposition 9 which permitted the cities in the State to <br />adopt regulatory and licensing ordinances to permit the play- <br />ing of bingo in the respective cities under certain specified <br />limitations and terms; that the ordinance is basically what <br />the State law permits; that individuals are not eligible for <br />licensing, only groups raising money for religious, charitable, <br />scientific, testing for public safety, literary or educational <br />purposes, and for the prevention of cruelty to children or <br />animals; and a non-profit organization exempted from State <br />corporation taxes and which permits gifts to be deducted as <br />charitable contributions under the Internal Revenue Code; <br />that with respect to the fee, the ordinance as drafted pro- <br />vides for a one-time license until revoked; and that the State <br />law provides~that the fee charged cannot exceed the City's <br />cost of issuing the license. <br /> <br />Speakers in favor of the bingo ordinance were: <br /> <br />Joseph A. Wolnik, 2050 South Evergreen <br />Harold Heinly, American Legion representative, 1200 N. Main <br />Bob Stuart, Immaculate Heart of Mary, 1625 S. Pacific <br />Howard Way, 715 West Second Street <br />Joseph Vogel, 916 Garfield <br />Charles Schlegel, 11761 Irvine Blvd., Tustin <br /> <br />The proponents stated that adoption of the ordinance would pro- <br />vide needed funds for charitable and religious programs. <br /> <br />There were no--speakers in opposition to the ordinance; Mayor <br />Garthe closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />The ordinance as follows was placed on second reading and <br />adopted on the unanimously carried (6:0) motion of Councilman <br />Ortiz, seconded by Councilman Brandt: <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 556 SEPTEMBER 20, 1976 <br /> <br /> <br />