Laserfiche WebLink
1) <br /> <br />z) <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />Installation by developer shall include street <br />trees and a 13.S-foot wide combination pedestrian <br />sidewalk and bike trail at an estimated cost of <br />$6,300; <br /> <br />Installation by City shall include irrigation <br />system and landscaping to complete the improve- <br />ments within the 26-foot right-of-way-at an <br />estimated cost of $11,300; <br /> <br />Maintenance of the bike trail, landscaping and irri- <br />gation system within the 26-foot area shall be the <br />responsibility of the City at an estimated cost of <br />$S00 per year. CA 18.6 <br /> <br />TITLE I - PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYMENT The eight prioritized <br />ACT - PROPOSED PROJECTS projects proposed for <br />APPROVED grant consideration <br /> und.er Title I of the <br />Public Works Employment Act of 19761 as proposed in the Assistant <br />City Manager's report dated October 14, 1976 were approved and <br />grant applications authorized, on the unanimously approved (S:0) <br />motion of Councilman Brandt, seconded by Councilman Ward. <br /> CA 99 <br /> <br /> AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT FIRM PRACTICES The report of Deputy <br /> INTERIM REPORT - REFERRAL #31-76 City Attorney Michael <br /> FILED J. Karger dated <br /> October 15, 1976 relat- <br /> ing progress in implementing audience measurement practices <br /> which would treat Orange County as a market separate from Los <br /> Angeles was received and filed on the motion of Councilman <br />Ward, seconded by Councilman Brandt and carried (S:0) <br />unanimously. CA 153.3 <br /> <br />HIRING MORATORIUM EXEMPTION On the request of <br />REQUEST - 5 POLICE PERSONNEL Police Chief Raymond <br />APPROVED Davi~ in his report <br /> dated October 12, <br />1976, exemption from the hiring moratorium and immediate. <br />hiring for the following five vacancies was authorized on <br />the unanimously approved (S:0) motion of Councilman Brandt, <br />seconded by Councilman Ward: <br /> <br />3 Typist Clerks Ir <br />1 Police Service Officer <br />1 Emergency Services Dispatcher <br /> <br />CA SO <br /> <br />POSSIBLE COUNCIL VACANCY The opinion of the <br />FOLLOWING NOV. 2 ELECTION Deputy City Attorney <br />REFERRAL ITEM #45-76 Richard E. Lay <br />FILED; DELETED FROM SUM}4ARY dated Octeber 11, 1976 <br /> <br /> · that the offices of <br />Councilman and Supervisor could not be held concurrently <br />was received and filed, and Council Referral Item #45-76 <br />was deleted from the Council Referral Summary, on the-motion <br />of Councilman Ward, seconded by Councilman Brandt, and <br />carried unanimously (5:0). CA 80 <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 402 OCTOBER 26, 1976 <br /> <br /> <br />