11-01-1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NEWPORT-IRVINE WASTE-MANAGEMENT Amendment No. 1 to PLANNING AGENCY AGREEMENT the Joint Exercise of CONTINUED Powers Agreement between the City and NIWA, and Resolution No. 76-132 as follows, were continued to November 15, 1976, on the motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Brandt, and carried (4:1), with Coun- cilman Bricken dissenting: RESOLUTION NO. 76-132 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING NEWPORT- IRVINE WASTE-MANAGEMENT PLANNING AGENCY (NIWA) 1976-77 GENERAL AND PROJECT COMMITTEE NO. 1 BUD- GETS. CA 145.12 A-76-81 A prior motion to table the matter made by Councilman Brandt, seconded by Councilman Evans failed on a (2:3) vote, with Councilmen Bricken,~Ward and Mayor Garthe dissenting. REQUEST FOR CONTRACT EXTENSION The request of the GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC. refuse contractor, CONTINUED Great Western Reclama- · tion, Inc., to con- tinue their request for contract extension to December 20, 1976 was granted on the unanimously approved (S:0) motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Brandt, and carried (5:0) unanimously. CA 11.1 CA 145.12 A-76-42 BAKER SQUARE PROJECT EIR 76-5 & VA 76-57 REFERRED TO PLANNING COIdMISSION Environmental Impact Report 76-5 Apartment Project at 611 and 615 and 630 North Baker. Mayor Garthe announced that this was the.time and place for the public hearing of concerning Baker Square North Bristol and at 618 Speaking to the Environmental Impact Report, Charles Zimmerman, Planning Director, stated that there had been an application approximately one year ago for this parcel; that it had not been an economically feasible plan; that the Environmental. Impact Report was amended, and the present plan calls for 90 dwelling units; that the Planning Commission added a con- dition that "all required covered parking is to be in the form of completely enclosed garages, elevations of said gar- ages to be approved by the Planning Department, unless an acceptable security system is approved by the Planning Depart- ment''. There were no proponents or opponents and the Mayor closed the public hearing. On the motion of Councilman Ward, seconded by Councilman Bricken and carried (5:0) unanimously the Draft EIR, all written materials pertaining thereto, and all verbal comments, were adopted as the Final Environmental Impact Report and certified to have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the City's rules and regulations, and that the Council has reviewed and considered the information contained therein. A discussion of Variance Application 76-57 followed. Council- man Ward objected to Item #4 in the Findings, and stated that he did not feel that a control gate was a proper alternative to garage doors. Councilman Bricken asked if the issues raised by the Police Department had been discussed by the CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 417 NOVEMBER 1,!1976