My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-05-1977
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1977
>
07-05-1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 1:59:04 PM
Creation date
5/7/2003 3:19:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/5/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
from pages 1, 5, 6, 10 and 13 of a Summary of Expansion Program <br />of Fashion Square, prepared by the Community Redevelopment Agency, <br />describing CALTRANS support for overpass and freeway access to <br />Fashion Square, a commitment from Montgomery Ward to locate in <br />Fashion Square, and the cost of the overpass, $5,691,000, which <br />represents almost half of the City's total investment. He asked <br />why there has been no community involvement except by the Cham- <br />ber of Commerce, who approved the proposal. <br /> <br />Mr. Montejano further stated that the area involved is already <br />served by Bristol, La Veta, Main Street and the Garden Grove <br />Freeway; that no additional access is needed. He reminded Coun- <br />cil that it has a responsibility to serve the homeowners of the <br />City and he opined that a Memory Lane Overpass would not be <br />in keeping with that responsibility; that it would generate <br />traffic incompatible with a residential neighborhood; that it <br />would serve no economical advantage; that it would be contrary <br />to the residential goals of the City as stated in the Community <br />Development Application, which is to maintain the residential <br />areas, not to increase the financial base. <br /> <br />Mr. Montejano addressed the question of Montgomery Ward's relocation <br />to Fashion Square being predicated on the construction of Memory <br />Lane Overpass. He described it as "economic blackmail" and added <br />that the people he represents, and the City, could not submit to <br />it, because Montgomery Ward wants the Overpass at the price of <br />destroying the neighborhood; and that it is possible to find <br />other alternatives, such as the Broadway Overpass. <br /> <br />He stated that the homeowners don't want, don't need, and can't <br />afford the Memory Lane Overpass; that the City must first determine <br />to study and decide whether or not there is a need, and what the <br />benefit will be from the widening of Memory Lane and the build- <br />ing of the Overpass before it proceeds with the EIR report; and <br />that substantial community input is required. <br /> <br />The following persons also spoke on the subject: <br /> <br />Conrad Schultz, 1811 N. Flower <br />Mickey Madden, 2319 N. Rosewood <br />A1 Garcie, 4006 N. Flower <br />Elizabeth Robertson, 1226 Sharon Road <br />Tom Eldridge, 606 W. Jonquil Rd. <br />Tom Thorkelson, 2624 N. Louise <br />Wayne Toscas, 1714 N. Flower <br /> <br />Some of the speakers stated that there had been no community <br />communication regarding the proposal to widen Memory Lane and <br />build the Overpass; that the proposal would destroy the beautiful <br />residential areas of Santa Ana; that community input and coopera- <br />tion can help provide the solutions to traffic access and the <br />Fashion Square shopping center expansion; and that traffic is <br />already a problem in the area. <br /> <br />Ot~r speakers opposed the approval of a contract for an EIR <br />for the extension of Memory Lane, and requested Council to stop <br />any further action in pursuing the project because it would <br />increase traffic and congestion and reduce the quality of life <br />in Santa Aha. <br /> <br />Each of the Councilmen responding emphasized that no final <br />decision has been made; that the purpose of the agreement is to <br />explore all the available alternatives; the timing is right for <br />community input regarding the entire access question; and that <br />a mechanism for community involvement and communication will be <br />developed. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />238 JULY $, 1977 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.