Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ORDER Council considered Agenda <br />RESOLUTION 78-5 17TH STREET Item 81, Petition for Delay <br />PARKING RESTRICTIONS - CONTINUED of Parking Restrictions on <br /> Seventeenth Street, follow- <br />ing a motion by Councilman Garthe, seconded by Councilman Ortiz, <br />to depart from the order of the Agenda. The motion carried 5:1, <br />with Councilman Bricken dissenting. <br /> <br />Eugene Katnik, Attorney, 1205 North Broadway, requested Council <br />to continue for 60 days the following resolution, which would <br />prohibit parking on both sides of Seventeenth Street from the <br />Santa Ana Freeway to Tustin Avenue, to become effective 180 days <br />after adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 78-5 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA PROHIBITING PARKING ON SEVENTEENTH STREET <br />BETWEEN THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY AND TUSTIN AVENUE. CA 18 <br /> <br />He stated that the continuance would give the businessmen affected <br />an opportunity to make their own analysis and obtain recommenda- <br />tions from traffic experts which would then be presented to the City <br />Council. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 78-5 and its related report, dated January 9, <br />1978, prepared by Joe Foust, were continued to March 20, 1978 <br />on the motion of Councilman Garthe, seconded by Councilman Ortiz, <br />and carried 5:1, with Councilman Yamamoto dissenting. <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF Vice Mayor Ward announced <br />RESOLUTION NO. 77-140 ABORTION that in response to a <br />NO ACTION written request dated <br /> January 5, 1978 from Paul <br />Blachowski, 1641 West Tenth Street, Council had allotted this <br />time to listen to residents' comments regarding Council's <br />adoption on December 19, 1977, of Resolution No. 77-140, opposing <br />the practice of abortion. <br /> <br />The following people spoke against the resolution: <br /> <br />Lyn Walker, 615 S. Main Street <br />Richard Sharp, 809 West Myrtle <br />Mindy Friedman, M.D., 1641 W. 10th <br />Drucina L. Cornell, 1127-1/2 Third Street <br />Norma Chinchilla, 401 E. Bishop <br /> <br />The opponents to the resolution stated that women's rights and <br />health care were not adequately considered by Council prior to <br />adoption of the resolution; that there have always been abortions <br />but they were only for the rich; that by adopting the resolution <br />Council has decided that the opportunity to have abortions should <br />be denied to poor, working and minority women, and it is an attack <br />on their rights; that the resolution should be rescinded in favor <br />of supporting the right of all women to have abortions at their <br />choice; that restrictive abortion laws only eliminate the practice <br />of legal abortion and do not eliminate the widespread practice <br />of abortion; that legalization of abortion, under decision of <br />the U.S. Supreme Court, has resulted in a decline in abortion <br />deaths, reduction in maternal mortality, improvement in maternal <br />health, lowered perinatal mortality rates and a decrease in high <br />risk out-of-wedlock births. <br /> <br />Many of the speakers are affiliated with abortion clinics, social <br />services and counseling centers and spoke of their first-hand <br />knowledge and experience with the subject. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />29 JANUARY 16, 1978 <br /> <br /> <br />