Laserfiche WebLink
CITY MEMBERSHIP IN SCAG On the motion of Council- <br />NONPAYMENT OF DUES AUTHORIZED man Brandt, seconded by <br /> Councilman Garthe, carried <br /> 4:1, with Councilman <br />Yamamoto dissenting, Staff was instructed not to pay Southern <br />California Association of Governments dues for a period of two <br />General Assembly Meetings after the same are due, which is con- <br />sidered equivalent to withdrawal under SCAG By-laws. The <br />Assistant City Manager's report dated March 30, 1978, outlined <br />Council's previous action regarding SCAG membership, and item- <br />ized possible motions to clarify the Council's intention regard- <br />ing withdrawal. CA 141 <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT UPDATE The report dated March 28, <br />LA BONITA PARK 1978 prepared by Director <br />FILED of Recreation and Parks <br /> Robert E. Gresham, giving <br />Council an update on plans and a tentative schedule for the <br />design and development of the 4.2 acre site located at La <br />Bonita and Progresso Streets unofficially known as La Bonita <br />Park, was received and filed on the motion of Councilman Bricken, <br />seconded by Councilman Brandt, and carried 5:0 unanimously. <br />The start of construction is set for December 4, with a comple- <br />tion target date of April, 1979. CA 52 <br /> <br />POLICY RE CRITERIA FOR After considering the <br />HIGHWAY PROJECT PRIORITIZATION analysis and recommenda- <br />STATEMENT ADOPTED tion of the Transportation <br /> and Traffic Engineer Joe <br />Foust, in his report dated March 28, 1978 regarding the method <br />used by the Orange County Transportation Commission to prioritize <br />highway projects, on the motion of Councilman Brandt, seconded <br />by Councilman Bricken, carried 5:0 unanimously, the following <br />general policy statement was adopted: <br /> <br />"In determining transportation project priorities, the Orange <br />County Transportation Commission should give greater consider- <br />ation to the positive impacts of those highway projects <br />which would tend to encourage revitalization of existing <br />urban areas and/or would relieve residential neighborhoods <br />from the intrusion of through traffic seeking alternates to <br />presently congested arterial routes. Further, additional <br />considerations should be given to the seniority status of <br />those projects which have been recognized as being needed <br />for a long time but have not been implemented due to lack <br />of funding." CA 29; CA 80.6 <br /> <br />PROPOSED BUDGET FOR The proposed Civic Center <br />CIVIC CENTER - FY 1978-79 Operating and Capital <br />APPROVED Budget for fiscal year <br /> 1978-79 proposed by <br />Director of Recreation and Parks Robert B. Gresham utilizing a <br />$55,885 carry-over balance from the prior year and projected <br />revenue of $409,452, was approved for submittal to the Civic <br />Center Commission, on the unanimously carried 5:0 motion of <br />Councilman Bricken, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto. CA 77 <br /> <br />CIVIC CENTER GROUNDS Consideration of the <br />REPLACEMENT OF MAINTENANCE MAN I replacement of a Grounds <br />CONTINUED TO JUNE 19 Maintenance Man I for <br /> Civic Center Grounds Maint- <br />enance was continued to June 19, 1978, on the unanimously car- <br />ried 5:0 motion of Councilman Bricken, seconded by Councilman <br />Brandt. A prior motion made by Councilman Bricken, seconded by <br />Councilman Garthe, to approve the hiring of a Grounds Maintenance <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />134 APRIL 3, 1978 <br /> <br /> <br />