Laserfiche WebLink
Electrical Code has been, over the years, more of a how-to <br />manual than a safety standard; that there has never been <br />a good set of national standards for electrical wiring for <br />building construction; and that our City Fire Department sup- <br />ports the proposed amendments to the National Electrical Code, <br />1975 Edition. <br /> <br />Those in opposition to the prohibition of aluminum wire in <br />sizes smaller than #6 were: <br /> <br />Brian Vaughan, 714 Fullerton Avenue <br />Dan Van Dorp, 865 Jasper Circle, Anaheim <br /> <br />Messrs. Vaughn and Van Dorp indicate that the Code is developed <br />with input from thousands of members in the industry, that the <br />suggestions are screened and those that have merit are incor- <br />porated in the Code; that the insurance companies that guarantee <br />and underwrite the safety of residences concur with the Code; <br />that the New York Fire,Underwriters are contributors to the <br />development of the Code; that the Code provides reasonable pro- <br />tection and is not intended to be a 100% complete safety doc- <br />ument; and that three Orange County cities, Fullerton, La Habra, <br />and Brea, have adopted the Code without amendments as w~ll as <br />the County of Riverside, the County of San Diego and the County <br />of San Bernardino. <br /> <br />There being no further speakers, Mayor Evans closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />On the motion of Councilman Bricken, seconded by Councilman <br />Ortiz, carried S:I with Councilman Garthe dissenting, the 1975 <br />Edition of the National Electrical Code was adopted as the <br />Electrical Code of the City of Santa Ana. <br /> <br />Assistant City Manager, Daniel <br />the 49 proposed amendments are <br />have been in force in the City <br /> <br />E. Stone, pointed out that 36 of <br />for administrative purposes and <br />for many years. <br /> <br />On the motion of Councilman Bricken, seconded by Councilman <br />Ward, carried 6:0 unanimously, 56 amendments to the National <br />Electrical Code now appearing in the City Municipal Code were <br />adopted. CA 87 <br /> <br />RECESS At 8:50 p.m. Mayor Evans <br /> recessed the meeting; <br /> at 8:55 p.m. the meeting <br />was reconvened with Councilman Ortiz absent and Councilman <br />Brandt rejoining the meeting. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPEAL <br />#386 OF THE DENIAL OF VA 77-76 <br />CONTINUED TO JUNE 5~ 1978 <br /> <br />#386 of the denial <br />office <br />Street <br /> <br /> Mayor Evans announced <br /> that this was the time <br /> and place for the public <br /> hearing of Negative <br /> Declaration and Appeal <br />of Variance 77-76 to allow a professional <br />in an existing residence at 1432 East Seventeenth <br />in the Ri District. <br /> <br />William Daugherty, Senior Planner, sta~dthat the subject pro- <br />perty is located at the southeast corner of Linwood and Seven- <br />teenth, that the property contains 5400 square feet and has a <br />1300 square foot residence thereon; that Seventeenth Street <br />is a planned arterial street and Linwood is a local residential <br />street; that the property is within a special study corridor <br />that extends the length of Seventeenth Street; that the Planning <br />Commission on January 23, 1978, denied the variance on a 4:3 <br />vote; that the applicant filed an appeal and the Council <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />19j MAY 15, 1978 <br /> <br /> <br />