Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 78-58 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ESTABLISHING AND REGULATING FEES <br />AND CHARGES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF <br />CHAPTER 8 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE. <br /> CA 87 <br /> CA 65 <br /> <br />MINNIE-STANDARD STREET On the motion of Councilman <br />IMPROVEMENT STATUS REPORT Ward, seconded by Council- <br />FILED man Brandt, carried 6:0 <br /> unanimously, the Minnie-Standard <br />Street Improvement status report prepared by'Peter Grams, undated, <br />was received and filed. <br /> <br />Manuel Rede, Deputy City Manager, orally summarized the contents <br />of the report and stated that.one problem yet unresolved is <br />the funding of alley resurfacing; that the Staff is investi- <br />gating possible sources o£ funds for the needed alley resurfacing; <br />and that Staff is also drafting a property maintenance ordinance <br />applicable to.complexes of eight or more dwelling units that <br />are ten or more years old to enable the City to begin clean-up <br />of some eight to ten other areas similar to the Minnie-Standard <br />Street area. CA 99.3 <br /> <br />COMPLAINTS REGARDING THE BUTCHERING Staff was requested to draft <br />OF ANIMALS FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION IN an Ordinance to prohibit the <br />BACK YARDS REFERRED TO STAFF FOR butchering of animals in <br />ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT back yards for human con- <br /> sumption, on the motion <br />of Councilman Brandt, seconded by Councilman Ward, carried 4:2 <br />with Councilmen Yamamoto and Ortiz dissenting. This motion <br />was preceded by a motion to receive and file the report dated <br />May 2, 1978 prepared by Captain E. B. Hansen in which he states <br />that the City has little means of prohibiting the activity with- <br />out amendment of City Ordinances. The motion adopted was sub- <br />stituted for a previous motion to receive and file the report. <br />Pat Lindros, 1907 South Maple, described the killing of a pet <br />pig in a neighbor's back yard which was quite disturbing to her <br />as well as to the children who witnessed the procedure. <br /> <br />Councilmen expressed concern about the health questions involved <br />in this practice and about those citizens who do not care to <br />have butchering done in a fashion encouraging onlookers. CA 95 <br /> <br />CETA REENACTMENT LEGISLATION On the motion of Councilman <br />FILED Ward, seconded by Council- <br /> man Brandt, carried S:l <br /> with Mayor Evans dissenting, <br />a report dated May 4, 1978, prepared by Keith E. Blunt, was <br />received and filed. The report advises Council of a proposed <br />Resolution by the Orange County Division, League of California <br />Cities, which takes exception to proposed Federal legislation <br />(HR 11086/S2S?0) as drafted, in the areas of Retirement benefits <br />and Wage Limitations for the continuance of CETA through <br />October 1, 1982. The resolution was presented by Council <br />person Vickie Evans of Cypress at a meeting of the Orange <br />County Division, League of California Cities. Councilman Brandt <br />stated that he had dissented to the resolution because of this <br />Council's position against two of the proposed amendments one <br />to SEction 122 (j) 1 and one to Section 608. CA 131.11; CA 148.1 <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />MAY 15, 1978 <br /> <br /> <br />