Laserfiche WebLink
would be eliminated ($50,000) to achieve 16.24% reduction, both <br />the position and outside counseling services would be eliminated <br />($81,~S0). <br /> <br />Mayor Evans moved to tentatively reduce the City Attorney's <br />budget by 15 per cent. The motion was seconded by Councilman <br />Garthe, and carried 6:1, with Councilman ~?ard dissenting. The <br />motion further instructed the City Attorney to determine how <br />the reduction could best be effected. CA 65B <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1978-79 BUDGET Planning Director Charles <br />5% REDUCTION Zimmerman distributed <br />TBNTA%IVELY APPROVED a report of S, 10 and 15 <br /> per cent proposed reductions <br />from a total proposed operating budget of $449,000. To achieve <br />a 5 per cent reduction, eliminate one Engineering Aide position <br />($1S,000), reduce overtime and training and transportation <br />accounts by $5,000 and $3,000, respectively; to achieve a 10 <br />per cent reduction, add the elimination of one Planning Techni- <br />cian ($19,000), one vehicle ($1,200) and reduce salaries for <br />temporary help by $2,300; to achieve 15 per cent, add the <br />elimination of one more Planning Technician ($19,000), reduce <br />office supplies by $1,?00 and cut salaries for temporary help <br />an additional $1,700. <br /> <br />Mr. Zimmerman stated that of the 15 largest cities in the State, <br />Santa Ana's Planning Department operates with the least number <br />of personnel; thatin 1975-76, the Department responded to the <br />need of the City Council and gave up 5 positions, representing <br />a 33% reduction in clerical personnel, in order to accommodate <br />the Community Oriented Policing Program; and that despite any <br />further reduction the Department will attempt to maintain a high <br />level of service with every management decision possible. <br /> <br />Councilman Bricken's motion to reduce the Planning Department <br />operating budget by 5% was seconded by Councilman Brandt, and <br />carried 6:1, with Councilman Garthe dissenting. The motion <br />further directed the Planning Director to determine how the <br />reduction could best be effected. <br /> <br />During the discussion prior to the vote on the motion, Councilman <br />Bricken stated that the Planning Department would be able to <br />eliminate its dependency on the CETA Program under the proposed <br />reduction. Councilman Garthe favored no reduction in the <br />Department's budget because of the building increase the City <br />is experiencing. Councilman Yamamoto stated his opinion that <br />the department budget should not be reduced, but that it is <br />not a matter of choice but of necessity. CA 65B <br /> <br />ORAL COMMUNICATION Mrs. Pat Lindros, 1907 S. <br />UTILITY USERS TAX Maple, inquired if the <br /> 3% Utilities Users Tax <br /> is used to fund the <br />Police Department operations. The City Manager responded that <br />these tax funds support the COP and paramedics programs, as <br />was the original intention. CA 65B <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned <br /> at 6:00 P.M. to Saturday <br /> June 24, at 8:00 A.M., <br /> in the City Council Cham- <br />bers, on the unanimously approved 7:0 motion of Councilman <br />Brandt, seconded by Councilman Garthe. <br /> <br />FLORENCE I. HALONE <br />CLERK OF THE COUNCIL <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 252 JUNE 21, 1978 <br /> <br /> <br />