1984-05 CRA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . .' RESOLUTION NO. 84-5 Page Four Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. with respect to violations of City or Agency codes or standards which are found to be a danger to the public health or safety, including those the City could abate in the absence of the Redevelopment Plan for the North Harbor Boulevard Redevelopment Project Area. Nevertheless, the power of the Agency will not be used to take any exempted property which is rendered contrary to the City's Zoning Ordinance as the result of Agency action. (f) Nothing in this section shall prevent the City or the Agency from utilizing eminent domain with the consent of the property owner, or from paying relocation benefits as required by law. Parking On-street parking from Harbor Boulevard will not be removed during the next ten years after the adoption of this Resolution without providing replacement parking for each 125 foot radius. Tax Increments Thirty percent (30%) of the tax increments or tax increment generated or related revenues, or moneys re- payable from tax increment from the project area shall be set aside solely and exclusively for low and moderate income housing and related activities such as rebates, low interest rehabilitation loans, public improvements or assisting in low in- come housing construction. Ambiguity Any ambiguity which may be found to exist regarding this Resolution including its Recitals shall be interpreted in accordance with the intention set forth in the Recitals and with the intent to permanently resolve and terminate the above- entitled lawsuit and the issues raised therein. When Resolution Effective This Resolution is adopted on the date recited below. Nevertheless, it shall be effective only when the Judgment attached hereto as Exhibit No.3 is filed in the Superior Court of Orange County. Such Judgment shall be a final, non-appealable judgment resolving all of the issues raised therein and determining that the Redevelopment Plan is in