My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1984-03 CRA
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
1973-1989
>
1984
>
1984-03 CRA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:22:06 PM
Creation date
3/2/2005 4:44:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
CRA 1984-03
Date
2/27/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />j <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'\' <br /> <br />EJC:adg <br />2/27/84 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 84-3 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br />OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS <br />FOR THE SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD FAIRVIEW STREET <br />REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND IN SETTLEMENT OF THAT <br />LITIGATION ENTITLED GIBSON v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br />etc., et al., O.C.S.C. NO. 38-58-61 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on July 6, 1982, the City Council of the City <br />of Santa Ana adopted and approved the Redevelopment Plan for the <br />South Harbor Boulevard Fairview Street Redevelopment Project Area <br />by Ordinance No. NS 1638; <br /> <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law of <br />the State of California (Health & Safety Code Sections 33000 et <br />~) the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa~na <br />(hereinafter nthe Agency") is charged with the responsibility of <br />carrying out the Redevelopment Plan for the South Harbor Boulevard <br />Fairview Street Redevelopment Project Area (hereinafter "the <br />Project Arean); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, an action entitled Gibson v. City of Santa Ana <br />etc. et al; Orange County Superior Court No. 38-58-61 has been <br />filed challenging the validity of the Plan; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Agency desires to settle and resolve the <br />above-entitled litigation; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the parties to the above-entitled action have <br />agreed to a STIPULATION, a copy of which is attached hereto as <br />Exhibit 1; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency in enacting this <br />Resolution. is acting in reliance on said STIPULATION and the <br />carrying out of its terms in good faith by the parties thereto; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, this Resolution shall be construed in accord- <br />ance with the following recitals of the Agency's interest: <br /> <br />(a) With respect to the exercise of eminent domain <br />by the Agency, it is the intent of the Agency to <br />waive its right of eminent domain for redevelopment <br />purposes through December 31, 1988. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.