07-17-1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Frank Palomino, 4826 West Seventh Street, asked whether or not there would be a street between Hazard and Seventh Street. He was advised by the Director of Public Works that there is no plan for a street; that the developer of the property may wish to design the development for a cul-de-sac. Anita Sanchez, 4926 West Sixth Street, asked when the improve- ments would be made. Mr. Stevens said the tentative schedule calls for starting the project around the end of October to finish around the end of February. As there were no further protests, Mr. Stevens announced that the number of protests by property owners within the District totaled 4.2% of the total number of property owners, although many of the protestors were not opposed to the District, but opposed to the assessment. In answer to Council questions, Mr. Stevens estimated the average assessment at $1,050 while approximately $200 will be assessed for the properties with previously installed curb, gutter and sidewalk because of the overall benefit and upgrading of the area. An additional $200 will be paid by Community Development funds for a total assessment of $400. There being no further discussion, Mayor Evans declared the hear- ing closed. On the motion of Councilman Yamamoto, Garthe, carried 7:0 unanimously, the adopted: seconded by Councilman following resolution was RESOLUTION NO. 78-89 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OVERRULING AND DENYING PROTESTS (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 242) Resolution No. 78-90 as follows was adopted on the unanimously carried 7:0 motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Council- man Ortiz: RESOLUTION NO. 78-90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND FURTHER STATING THAT THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931" DOES NOT APPLY (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 242). On the unanimously carried 7:0 motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Councilman Garthe, the following resolution was adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 78-91 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ORDERING THE WORK AND IMPROVEMENTS, TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES, IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (ASSESS- MENT DISTRICT NO. 242). The motion of Councilman Yamamoto to adopt the following resolu- tion was seconded by Councilman Ortiz, and carried 7:0 unanimously: RESOLUTION NO. 78-92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES IN SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 242). CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 308 JULY 17, 1978