Laserfiche WebLink
square feet, of which 600 square feet are used for kitchen <br />space and 600 for service, with no bar; that the subject <br />location is surrounded by commercial activity; and that <br />within 300 feet to the north, south and west are single <br />family residences. <br /> <br />Joseph Genovese, Attorney representing Lucio and Emilia <br />Quantero, the applicants, stated that the Quantero's have <br />provided a good Mexican restaurant; that they have no intention <br />of staying open past 9:00 P.M.; and thaf the family intends <br />to run a reputable establishment. <br /> <br />Joe Montoya, 231 East Walnut, also spoke in favor of the <br />Minor Exception, stating that the restaurant serves good <br />food; that there is no bar; that consumption of beer with <br />food generally presents no problems; and that the Quantero's <br />are a fine family and sincerely mean to run the restaurant in <br />an orderly fashion. <br /> <br />There were no other proponents and no opponents; the Acting <br />Clerk of the Council reported there were no written communica- <br />tions; and the Mayor closed the Public Hearing. <br /> <br />The motion of Councilman Ortiz, seconded by Councilman Brandt, <br />to approve and file the Notice of Exemption and direct the <br />City Attorney to prepare a resolution approving Minor Excep- <br />tion 78-19 and affirming the decision of the Planning Commis- <br />sion, carried 5:2, with Councilmen Ward and Yamamoto dissenting. <br /> CA 13.2 <br /> <br />AGENDA ORDER On the unanimously car- <br />MAC ARTHUR PARK ried 7:0 motion of Coun- <br />STATUS REPORT FILED cilman Brandt, seconded <br /> by Councilman Garthe, <br />Council received and filed the report prepared by Administra- <br />tive Assistant Estela F. Gutierrez entitled "Status Report: <br />Park Maintenance and Recreational Concerns at Mac Arthur Park", <br />which addressed the objections of area residents to the use <br />of the park for soccer. The report concluded that the major <br />problems at MacArthur Park have been either corrected or are <br />in process of being resolved. CA S2 <br /> <br />APPEAL NO. 396, A.A. NO. 804 Mayor Evans announced that <br />EUCLID STREET & MC FADDEN AVE. his firm has an escrow in <br />DENIED APPEAL this matter; he did not <br /> participate in its con- <br />sideration because of a conflict of interest; and he left the <br />Chambers at this time and did not return to the meeting. <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Ward opened the Public Hearing of Negative Declara- <br />tion and Appeal No. S96 of the denial of Amendment Application <br />No. 804 to rezone property located on the northwest corner of <br />Euclid Street and McFadden Avenue from the Ri (Single Family <br />Residence) District to the C5 (Arterial Commercial) District. <br /> <br />Planning Director Charles Zimmerman, using display maps and <br />slide projection, described the land use in the area, and <br />at the proposed site, which is now occupied by a vacant ser- <br />vice station; he summarized the information contained in the <br />Planning Department report dated October 6, 1978, stating that <br />neighboring uses are primarily low density residential in <br />accordance with the General Plan. He said that the Catholic <br />Church at the southwest corner of Euclid and McFadden had <br />objected to a previous request for variance for a Seven-Eleven <br />store at 629 South Euclid Street, and that it was denied by <br />the Planning Commission and appeal denied by Council; that two <br />variances and a conditional use permit had been approved in the <br />area for residential uses in 1976, 1977 and 1978; that the Com- <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 458 NOVEMBER 6, 1978 <br /> <br /> <br />