Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />elimination of blighting conditions on properties within two blocks <br />of the boundary of the South Main project Area. - The proximity of <br />the properties to the South Main project Area also makes it <br />possible for persons patronizing businesses in the South Main <br />project Area to park in parking facilities in the central city <br />Project Area. Therefore, the increased availability of parking <br />near the SoutÌl Main Project Area will also be of benefit to the <br />South Main project Area. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />NO OTHER REASONABLE MEANS OF FINANCING THE PUBLIC <br />FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS IS AVAILABLE TO THE COMMUNITY <br /> <br />If the funds were available, the acquisition and rehabil- <br />itation of the properties could be funded with tax increment <br />revenues or other funds generated from the Central city project <br />Area. However, due to the fact that all tax increment revenues <br />from the Central City project Area have been pledged to repay tax <br />allocation bonds, sufficient funds are not currently available. <br /> <br />C~.-- <br /> <br />The city itself is not in a position to finance the <br />acquisition and rehabilitation of the properties from any source of <br />funds. In California, municipal or tax-exempt financing has <br />traditionally taken one of two basic forms: general obligation <br />bonds or revenue bonds. General obligation bonds pledge ad valorem <br />property_taxes without limit as to rate or amount; hence they were <br />highly regarded by investors,'_ãnd commanded the lowest borrowing <br />rate because of their minimal credit risk. However, the affirma- <br />tive vote of two-thirds of the people is required to issue such <br />bonds. Due to the costs involved in such a bond issue, this type <br />of financing is not feasible for the acquisition and rehabilitation <br />of the Properties. <br /> <br />Revenue bonds are payable from a specific revenue source <br />other than property taxes. These bonds have been used extensively <br />for financing water, sewer, or other utility systems, toll bridges <br />and airports, where revenues of the enterprises are reasonably well <br />assured. Issuance of conventional revenue bonds generally requires <br />a simple majority vote. However, the Properties are not expected <br />to generate sufficient revenue to support a revenue bond issue. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The city's general revenues are another possible source <br />of revenue for funding the acquisition and rehabilitation of the <br />Properties. However, since the passage of proposition 13, severe <br />strains have been placed on the city's revenues. Most devastating <br />of the causes for revenue curtailment has been the withholding from <br />cities by the State of California of revenues traditionally <br />subvented to local government. Some of these sources simply have <br />been commandeered by the State. other sources of subvented <br />revenues have been withheld on an allegedly temporary basis, but <br />there is no certainty that the reduction of the subvention stream <br />might not be permanent. The fact of diminished revenue, and the <br />need to provide a suitable level of services, dictate that the city <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />29 <br />