My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1995-06 CRA
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
1995-06 CRA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:21:13 PM
Creation date
3/3/2005 9:52:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
CRA 1995-06
Date
6/20/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br />[" <br />i <br /> <br />!: <br />[ <br />r <br />.. <br />[ <br />(: <br />Ü <br />[ <br />[ <br />~ <br />[ <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />All future major park improvements located in the South Main <br />street Redevelopment project Area shall be reviewed through <br />the city's Development Review Committee. <br /> <br />Light and Glare <br /> <br />Effect <br /> <br />The additional development that is anticipated to occur within the <br />Project Area would increase the amount of both light and glare in <br />the immediate vicinity of each project. <br /> <br />Mitiaation Measures <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />All future projects shall be reviewed by the City for <br />potential light and glare impacts prior to project approval or <br />issuance of building permits. <br /> <br />Aesthetics <br /> <br />Effect <br /> <br />Some of the additional development that is anticipated to occur <br />within the Project Area could have individual aesthetic impacts. <br /> <br />Mitiaation Measures <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />All proposed development projects within the Project Area <br />shall undergo site plan and design review by the Planning <br />Division for evaluation of potential aesthetic impacts prior <br />to the issuance of building permits. <br /> <br />VII:I. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> <br />CEQA Guidelines section. 15126 (b) requires a discussion of" <br />reasonable alternatives to the proposed project or to the location <br />of the project. An EIR need not consider an alternative whose <br />implementation is remote or speculative (see Residents Ad Hoc <br />Stadium committee vs. Board of Trustees (1979) 89 Cal. App. 3d <br />274) . <br /> <br />No project Alternative <br /> <br />Findina <br /> <br />Finding 3: <br /> <br />specific economic, social or other considerations <br />make infeasible the mitigation measures or project <br />alternatives identified in the EIR. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.