Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />MINUTES <br />COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br /> <br />January 8,1975 <br /> <br />Commissioner Garthe stated that the only advantage, in his <br />opinion, is the fact that the bonds will provide for general <br />improvement but that the income will take away from the City's <br />operation as far as taxes are concerned. <br /> <br />The Executive Director stated that the total cost for the study <br />is estimated at $56,000, to be advanced by the City, with $20,000 <br />going for the consultant planning study and the balance for <br />Building Department staff time; and that a decision could be made, <br />at some point prior to expenditure of the total $56,000, to con- <br />tinue or discontinue the study. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ward requested a preliminary report that would <br />indicate reasons for the selection of one area rather than <br />another for improvement, and reasons for the types of improve- <br />ments proposed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gr~set expressed his concern with blighted industrial <br />areas and suggested that some attention be given to them. Com- <br />missioner Bricken concurred that the right focus would achieve a <br />better balance of objectives to serve two or three purposes rather <br />than one. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bricken moved that the Executive Director consider <br />the feasibility'of phasing the expenditure of funds for the <br />approved study so that a report can be generated, as appropriate, <br />when there is enough information to determine whether or not it <br />is advisable to proceed further. The motion was seconded by <br />Commissioner Ward and carried unanimously (6-0). <br /> <br />The Executive Director <br />stated that the Ralph C. <br />Sutro Company represents <br />a lender who has pre- <br />liminarilyexpressed <br />interest in lending the Agency 100 million dollars for a 20-year <br />period at an interest rate of under 8 percent; that there would <br />be no annual payments and the money would be repaid in one pay- <br />ment at the end of 20 years; that the funds could be used for <br />any development purposes as long as they are secured either by <br />a mortgage or tax increment; and that the money was immediately <br />available. <br /> <br />RALPH C. <br />SUTRO COMPANY <br />FUNDING PROPOSAL <br /> <br />Mr. Goblirsch further stated that there are some risks; namely, <br />the interest would be compounded which means that if 100 million <br />dollars was borrowed at 9 percent (including points, fees, etc.) <br />the Agency would be obligated to repay 514 million dollars; that <br />the advantages to the Agency would be tremendous because it <br />would be possible to lend developers short and long term dollars <br />and the downtown program could be tremendously accelerated. <br /> <br />The Executive Dir~ctor was authorized to proceed with negotiations <br />with Ralph C. Sutro Company as a source of funding for the Agency, <br />on the unanimously approved motion of Commissioner Griset, <br />seconded by Commissioner Ward. <br /> <br />The Executive Director <br />reported that the property <br />located on the southwest <br />corner of Main Street and Santa Ana Boulevard (A.P. No. 8-057-03) <br />and the property on the north side of 5th Street and East of Ross <br />Street (A.P. No. 8-051-16) have been acquired by the Agency; and <br />that the Redevelopment Commission will be making recommendations <br />to the Agency regarding their disposition. <br /> <br />PROPERTY ACQUIRED <br /> <br />-3- <br />