Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. . . . <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF CONCEPT OF MOHLER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY <br /> <br />Agency members Ward and Evans left the meeting. <br /> <br />The Executive Director reported that Staff did not have the <br />drawings for the Mohler Development, and requested a continuance <br />on this matter. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Mr. ~í~he and seconded by Mr. Brandt to <br />continue the approval of cdrlcept of the Mohler Development <br />Company. Before the question was called for, much discussion <br />ensued. <br /> <br />Agency member Bricken expressed concern that the public <br />neighborhood be informed of what is transpiring in the area. <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />The Executive Director reported that the property owners and <br />adjacent property owners have been contacted, and have been shown <br />the illustration of the proposed Mohler development at the <br />Commission level. <br /> <br />The Executive Director stated that the purpose of today's meeting <br />was to present the basic concept of the multi story office <br />building as proposed by Mohler, and to show the direction the <br />Agency is proceeding along. The office building will be about 11 <br />or 12 stories. The EIR is being prepared, and subject to required <br />hearings, the public will have the opportunity for input at that <br />stage, and at least three or four more opportunities prior to the <br />time Staff will bring this back to the Agency for final action. <br /> <br />Mr. Bricken again expressed his uneasiness about not notifying the <br />people in the entire area before it gets too late. The Executive <br />Director stated that Staff intends to make contact with all <br />involved once Staff has additional information from the EIR report <br />so that Staff could talk intelligently about the impacts, but <br />stated that if the Agency wanted Staff to do it sooner, he would <br />be happy to do so. <br /> <br />The question was then called for on the motion made by Mr. Garthe <br />and seconded by Mr. Brandt to continue the approval of the concept <br />of the Mohler Development Company. The motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />MEETING DATE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br /> <br />A motion was made by Mr. Bricken, seconded by Mr. Ward but failed <br />by the following roll call vote to establish the fourth Tuesday of <br />each month as the Redevelopment Agency meeting day. <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Brandt, Bricken, Garthe <br />Ward, Evans, Yamamoto <br />Ortiz <br /> <br />A motion was made by Mr. Garthe, seconded by Mr. Bricken and <br />carried by the following roll call vote to continue the issue of <br />the meeting date of the Redevelopment Agency. <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Brandt, Bricken, Garthe, Ward <br />Evans, Yamamoto <br />Ortiz <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />There being no further business before the Community Redevelopment <br />Agency, the meeting was adjourned at 3:42 P.M. upon the motion of <br />Mr. Evans, seconded by Mr. Ward and carried unanimously. <br /> <br />::~ <br /> <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />David L. Brandt, Chairman <br /> <br />-7- <br />