Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~ ---- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MINUTES <br />SPECIAL MEETING <br />COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br />SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA <br />MARCH 21, 1978 <br /> <br />The Special Meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City <br />of Santa Ana was called to order by the Vice Chairman at 4:30 P.M. in <br />the City Hall Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, <br />California. After the pledge to the Flag, roll was called: <br /> <br />PRESENT <br /> <br />ABSENT <br /> <br />Gordon Bricken <br />Vernon Evans <br />David Ortiz <br />James Ward <br /> <br />David Brandt <br />John Garthe <br />Harry Yamamoto <br /> <br />Others in attendance: <br /> <br />Richard E. Goblirsch, Executive Director <br />James Saffron, Stone & Youngberg <br />Bruce Spragg, City Manager <br />Keith Gow, City Attorney <br />The Times <br />The Reg ister <br /> <br />TAX INCREMENT BONDS <br /> <br />Vice Chairman called on the Executive Director to report on bond sale. <br />The Executive Director introduced the Agency's tax consultant, Mr. Jim <br />Saffron, President of Stone & Youngberg, who gave a brief report. <br /> <br />Mr. Saffron reported that in meeting with the rating agencies, the <br />bonds received an excellent rating, rating assigned by Moody's Investor <br />Service was Baa-I, rating assigned by Standard & Poor's Corporation was <br />A-I. These ratings illustrated that the Santa Ana project is a <br />successful one and was graded as excellent. <br /> <br />He further reported that this morning, in spite of the proposed Jarvis <br />amendment, a very good bid of 6.63% was received from Merrill Lynch, <br />Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Incorporated. To put that bond in <br />perspective, Mr. Saffron presented the following information: San <br />Bernardino offered a $23 million bond and received one bid for 7% (San <br />Bernardino had offered these bids for sale three weeks before and then <br />cancelled the sale). Therefore, 6.63% is really an excellent bid <br />compared to others that have been bid. He emphasized that the timing <br />in light of the Jarvis issue could not be.more precise. He stated that <br />in his opinion, this sale may very well be the last sale of tax <br />increment bond prior to the June election. Those cities that do stay <br />in the market face the possibility of high bids. <br /> <br />Mr. Bricken questioned how Jarvis is effecting bond presently being <br />offered for sale by other cities. Mr. Saffron replied that most issues <br />are selling, regardless of the times. For instance, the City of Lama <br />Linda received a 5.4% bid for a general obligation bond. <br /> <br />In closing, Mr. Saffron related that staff did a good job in New York <br />in getting the bond rated. Bond proceeds will be within $100,000 of <br />those presented in the official statements. <br /> <br />The Executive Director added as a closing statement that a good faith <br />. check in the amount of $135,000 was put up by the Merril Lynch <br />Incorporated and recommended that the bond be awarded to Merrill Lynch, <br />