Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~. <br />~. <br />i <br /> <br />e. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />--~ <br />~. .\' '.,' .~; ~; ,ÿ <br />¡;" "-'7'.,<",i; <br />.1,.1, . ',"" <br />I . ,'- <br />(~.".' SEr 17 'oR ";~~ <br /> <br />\ '.,: - '~uO j~:' <br />\';' , ".' /~-..; <br />\ t,; " /' ,) / <br />,~ ' . . / . :'> <br />'I,; 1;; - ÃÎ~t: ):j' <br /> <br />" <br />.. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />5ept.c¡"bl:r 10, 1980 <br /> <br />t,:¡u'k Ii.' Brcab;tone, LSq. <br />Lloyds Bank California <br />G12 South Flower ~treet <br />Los Angeles, Cä1i[ornia 90017 <br /> <br />He: <br /> <br />Llpyds 3ank California <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Dear t:r. Drea;;st.ohC: <br /> <br />In rcspo~se to your letter of Au~ust 29,1960, we <br />snall honor your r~guest thbl the lcttl:r be placed in the <br />rc;cord of the public hearing on the resolution of necessity. <br />( <br /> <br />i'rocc",éin'j ','ith the rE:solution of necessity should <br />not Le view?d by the r;¡,nk as a deferment of negotiations <br />\lith rE:spect to acquisition of the parcels in question, <br />since \Ie are constantly negotiating in such ~att~rs ~ntil <br />the tilac of trial in an eJ:lÌnent domai.n lawsuit. <br />. rurther~ore, contrary to your assertion, proceeding with the <br />, steDs r.,ouired for an e¡úÌnent ðO¡¡¡Ðin case is not .coercive. <br />. activity.within the meaning of GovernMent CoJe S~ction <br />:- 72G7,5, but is necessary to rùúintain the til.\c table of <br />events [or construction of the garage. he òeter¡;iÌno:d that <br />such steps were necessary in oròer to acquire the fee <br />interest in parcels 003-126-09, 000-12G-OC and 000-126-10. <br />Our deterr..ir.ation Wi!S based, in part, on your rejection of <br />our proposal in your letter of July 24, 1980. <br /> <br />\\ <br /> <br />with respect to your letter of August ¿7, 1980, we <br />are in a pesi tion to recoró1lHo:nd approval to the Agency of <br />most of the items r:,entioned, since they are essentially the <br />same terws we proposed to the Bank as a solu~ion during our <br />i'o¡eeting on "arch 26, 19<;0. Your letter of July 24, 19ßO <br />rej.ccted that pro¡>osal, \Ihich led us to bel icve other steps <br />\:ould be required. <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />r.. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />II <br />