Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />that Mr. Robert Fainbarg, owner of a parcel adjacent to the sales <br />parcel, has been using a portion of the parcel on a month-to-month <br />basis (under an oral agreement with the present t~nants) for <br />loading and unloading and convenience parking. Mr. Fainbarg has <br />no legal right to the parcel, but needs to acquire an interest <br />covering access, loading and unloading. Staff has been working on <br />a solution to allow the sale of the parcel to the Greenbergs and <br />still protect the Fainbarg property. Staff thought an agreement <br />had been reached with Mr. Greenberg which would provide that prior <br />to conveying the property to the Greenbergs, the Redevelopment <br />Agency would convey to the Fainbargs the right of access across <br />their property, and further grant a right covering loading and <br />unloading within a specified area. Late Friday, March 14, the <br />Fainbargs said this was not acceptable to them, and that they <br />would prefer to purchase the easterly 25 feet of the parcel. The <br />Greenbergs, in order to carry out their plans, would require a <br />very minor access easement on the property proposed to be sold to <br />the Fainbargs. The dispute comes down to the Greenberg's wish to <br />proceed with the agreement as proposed. They desire to own all of <br />the property, but they are willing to let the Agency provide <br />ingress and egress and loading rights to the Fainbargs via an <br />easement. The Fainbarg's position is that they would prefer to <br />own the 25 feet, and they will give the Greenbergs an easement for <br />ingress and egress over the portion required for driveway <br />purposes. <br /> <br />The Executive Director pointed out that in the memorandum to the <br />Redevelopment Agency on the subject matter, dated March 17, 1980, <br />there were two options the Agency could take: one in favor of the <br />Greenbergs; and one in favor of the Fainbargs. <br /> <br />The Executive Director further stated that if this matter is <br />delayed it could affect the Greenberg's financing that they have <br />secured from the Federal Government ($250,000 at 3% interest). <br />The cut-off date is April 29, 1980. <br /> <br />The Acting Chairman asked to hear from the public in agreement <br />with the environmental findings or the proposed sale. The <br />following spoke: <br /> <br />Mr. Billy Greenberg, 11211 Hunting Horn, Santa Ana <br />Mr. Harry Greenberg, 34545 Camino Capistrano, Capistrano Beach <br />Howard Way, 801 W. Tenth Street, Santa Ana <br /> <br />The Acting Chairman then asked to hear from the public disagreeing <br />with the environmental findings or the proposed sale. The <br />following spoke: <br /> <br />Mr. Alan Fainbarg, Newport Beach <br /> <br />After lengthy discussion, the Acting Chairman closed the public <br />hearing and entertained a motion regarding the environmental <br />findings. A motion was made by Mr. Serrato, seconded by Mr. <br />Bricken and carried by the following roll call vote to adopt <br />Resolution 80-25: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT <br />AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS <br />NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED MAJOR COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION OWNER <br />PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br />OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND HARRY GREENBERG AND EVELYN GREENBERG <br />FOR THE SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE <br />SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Bricken, Luxembourger, Serrato, Yamamoto <br />Markel <br />Griset, Ward <br /> <br />-2- <br />