My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/16/1983
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
SUCCESOR AGENCY(formerly Community Redevelopment Agency)
>
COMMUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
1973-1999
>
1983
>
08/16/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:15:14 PM
Creation date
3/3/2005 11:27:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/16/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />it <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Seismic Ordinance should be postponed until <br />Urbatec decides what they're really going to do; <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Business and property owners within the affected <br />area did not wish to rehabilitate their buildings <br />if they were going to be demolished; and <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />120 days was a long time and they would like to <br />see the time reduced. <br /> <br />In response to a question raised by Chairman Luxembourger, <br />the City Manager stated that any property owner who <br />rehabilitates his or her property will be exempted from <br />eminent domain. <br /> <br />Mr. MacLaurin stated that he had made every effort to <br />communicate with staff. He also stated that Urbatec was <br />devoting a lot of time so that a careful analysis would be <br />done. <br /> <br />In response to a question raised by Mrs. McGuigan, the <br />Community Development Director responded that the majority <br />of the buildings, 70 to 75%, had been mailed the seismic <br />letters. <br /> <br />Mr. Young stated that 120 days was not acceptable to him. <br />He also stated that he would like to support a motion of a <br />90 day period with the requirement that the developer, <br />within thirty (30) days, give adequate notice to affected <br />parties within the development site and meet with them and <br />that he would not support consideration of extensions for <br />seismic ordinance compliance. <br /> <br />Mr. MacLaurin stated that four months was barely enough time <br />to do the task. <br /> <br />In response to several questions raised by Mr. Acosta, the <br />City Manager stated that Urbatec was the one that was <br />requesting the 120 day extension and that normally we do not <br />submit their work to the Agency. <br /> <br />In response to a question raised by Mr. Acosta, Mr. <br />MacLaurin stated that Urbatec had worked with staff and did <br />get involved in discussions at all levels. <br /> <br />In response to several questions raised by Chairman <br />Luxembourger, the City Manager stated that a request from <br />the property owners had been made to set up a meeting so <br />that they could understand what was going on. He also <br />stated that the seismic letters did not require the <br />rehabilitation of the buildings within the first year. <br /> <br />-)- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.