05/15/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, . Santa Ana City Council/ Community Redevelopment Agency May 15, 1984 Page Four . Most important, Santa Ana has failed to submit the Proposed Development to the Joint Planning Review Committee, as . required by Section 4.0(B) (6) of the TSIP. Under those circumstances, the TSIP may not be available to implement and fund mitigation measures associates with the Proposed Development. The removal of this linchpin to the matrix of mitigation measures proposed by the EIR would render the EIR fatally defective. The EIR should be restudied and revised forthwith to determine the environmental consequences, and to formulate mitïgation measures relatin~ to, the Pro?osed Development without the TSIP. IV. IMPROPER CONSIDERATION OF MEASURES REQUIRING THE CONCURRENCE OF OTHER AGENCIES The Proposed Development and mitigation measures include several critical items that require the concurrence of the City òf Orange. The EIR is deficient in that it fails to consider the feasibility of those items; i.e., the possibility that Orange may decline or be unable to implement any or all of these items. . Traffic mitigation measures of the Proposed Development requiring the concurrence and participation of the City of Orange include the following: . . 1. The restriping of Bedford Road to four lanes; 2. Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Bedford Road and La Veta; 3. 4. Restriping of Main Street at La Veta Avenue; Widening of Main Street within the jurisdiction of the City of Orange; 5. Reconstruction of the median and develooment of left turn pocket on Town and Country Roåd at Uain Street; 6. Modification of the traffic signal and phasing at the intersection of Main Street and Town and Country Road; 7. Modification of interchange and construction of bridge at Lawson Way, La Veta Avenue and the Garden Grove Freeway: and 8. Construction of Flower Street ramp connection to the Orange Freeway. \1...