08/19/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

å . . a quality project, whichever is applicable. She stated that the Council's Economic Development and Housing Subcommittees had reviewed and approved this strategy. She stated that staff had successfully negotiated the voluntary sale of two vacant properties: one 6,000 square foot lot in the Logan neighborhood which will accommodate two to three units, and one 6,250 square foot lot in the Lacy neighborhood which will accommodate two to four units, adding that, in staff's opinion, this will provide quality housing and assist in the rejuvenation of this area. Agency Member Acosta reviewed the history of the zoning of the Logan Area and pointed out that it was essentially a M-2 or Industrial area and he felt that the taking of a lot for residential purposes would be depriving someone of an industrial site. After further discussion by the Agency Members, it was moved by Agency Member Luxembourger, seconded by Vice Chairman Johnson and carried unanimously (7-0) that the acquisition of the real property at 1026 North Logan Street be referred back to the Council's Housing Sub-committee for further study and a report back to the Agency at a later date. It was then moved by Agency Member Hart, seconded by Agency Member Acosta and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency authorize the Chairman to execute all appropriate documents for acquisition of the real property at 616 East Fifth Street from Jesus Ortiz Estrada for the negotiated amount of $63,000.00. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED STREET (A.P.N. 398-042-2, 3 & 4) 817-825 NORTH LACY AT The City Manager called upon the Neighborhood Improvement Program Manager to answer some questions that were being posed regarding the costs involved in the relocation of the Victorian structure from 322 East Chestnut. The Neighborhood Improvement Program Manager stated that the Agency was paying the developer $30,000 for the Victorian structure; that there would be an estimated charge of $35,000 to move it, which would include the cost of cutting the house if it was necessary in the relocation process; and that one-third of the cost of the North Lacy Street property would be $70,000, thus bringing the total cost of relocating this structure to approximately $135,000. She added that staff did not anticipate recouping the entire cost of the project and pointed out that the relocation of this structure was being done in order to preserve one of the most outstanding examples of Victorian architecture in Santa Ana. After further discussion, it was moved by Agency Member Young, seconded by Agency Member Acosta and carried unanimously (7:0) 3 7