07/15/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . It was moved by Vice Chairman Johnson, seconded by Chairman Griset and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency adopt Resolution No. 86-39: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE A-2 DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC NECESSITY THEREFOR. (307-309 WEST FOURTH STREET) PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 86-41 DIRECTING CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE FIFTH AND MAIN PARKING STRUCTURE SITE (A.P. NO. 398-258-12) The Chairman announced that it was the time and place for the public hearing on the issue of the public necessity to acquire by condemnation a property identified by Assessor Parcel Number, as book 398, Page and Block 258, Parcel 12, for redevelopment purposes. He asked staff to identify the property and the project and to comment on the factors and evidence necessitating the condemnation action. He requested that staff set forth why the public interest and necessity require the project; why the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with greatest public good and the least private injury; why the property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project; and, whether or not the offer as required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner of record, or any offer has not been made because the owner cannot be located with reasonable diligence. The Real Estate Manager stated that he wished to incorporate the staff memorandum on pages 67 and 68 as a part of his report. He pointed out that the subject property is owned by Mrs. Clara E. Clem and that a settlement at the appraised value of the property had been reached but that staff wished to proceed with the Resolution of Necessity in the event that any difficulty is encountered in closing the escrow for the property. In response a query from the Chairman, the Agency responded that there were no written communications. Secretary The Chairman then stated that the Agency would like to hear from those people who desired to speak in agreement or disagreement with the subject condemnation action. There being no one who wished to address the Agency, the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. When he asked if the Agency Members had any further questions or comments, there was no response. He then called for a motion. It was moved by Agency Member Acosta, seconded by Agency Member McGuigan and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency adopt Resolution No. 86-41: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT 8