Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES IN THE FASHION SQUARE EXPANSION AND <br />DEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, <br />AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC NECESSITY THEREFOR. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CONSULTANT CONTRACT WITH <br />ANA AUTO MALL <br /> <br />BRIAN <br /> <br />A.STIRRAT <br /> <br />& <br /> <br />ASSOCIATES, <br /> <br />SANTA <br /> <br />In response to questions from Agency <br />Executive Director/Economic Development <br />consultant's fee would not exceed $25,000. <br />member of Stirrat & Associates was present <br />Members wished to ask questions. <br /> <br />Member McGuigan, the <br />stated that the <br />He added that a <br />if any of the Agency <br /> <br />In response to a question from Agency Member Acosta, the <br />Executive Director/Economic Development stated that Chevron did <br />not disclose that the tanks existed and staff had no way of <br />knowing that they were there. <br /> <br />In response to questions from Agency Member Luxembourger, the <br />Executive Director/Economic Development stated that this <br />particular site was the entry-way to the Auto Mall and could <br />not be excluded from the Auto Mall site. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />After further discussion, it was moved by Vice Chairman <br />Johnson, seconded by Agency Member Hart and carried unanimously <br />that the Agency authorize the Chairman to execute an agreement <br />with Brian A. Stirrat & Associates to perform the necessary <br />services associated with the removal of contaminated soil <br />within the Auto Mall site, with their fee not exceeding <br />$25,000.00. <br /> <br />CONSULTANT SELECTION FOR STRATEGY PLAN LAND USE ANALYSES <br /> <br />Agency Member Young commented that, in reading the material <br />furnished by staff on this item and having a superficial <br />knowledge about the firms being considered, it seemed to him <br />that, since LSA was the low bidder, they should be awarded the <br />contract particularly since staff gave no persuasive reason for <br />not selecting them. <br /> <br />Agency Member Acosta stated that he had felt the same way until <br />staff had explained to him at an earlier meeting that day that <br />LSA did not have comparable experience in the area of land use <br />analyses. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Agency Member Young pointed out that one of the City's Senior <br />Planners was now a member of LSA and he felt it would be <br />difficult to argue that this man was not an expert. <br /> <br />The Executive Director/Economic Development stated that all <br />three of the firms that had presented bids were excellent and <br />had worked for the Agency on other projects. He added that the <br />determining factor that influenced staff to recommend Michael <br />Brandman was his many years of experience in land uses analyses <br />and the fact that this was not an area in which LSA had <br />expertise. <br /> <br />5. <br />