My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/20/1987
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
SUCCESOR AGENCY(formerly Community Redevelopment Agency)
>
COMMUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
1973-1999
>
1987
>
01/20/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:14:55 PM
Creation date
3/3/2005 11:54:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/20/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />improvements are in average condition since most of the recent <br />improvements have been cosmetic improvements, such as exterior and <br />interior paint and new carpets and drapes. The Real Estate Manager <br />then made a brief slide presentation showing the motel and the <br />surrounding area and added that the subject property was not exempt <br />from condemnation. He stated that the public interest and necessity <br />will be well served and this under-utilized property will be <br />supplanted by a quality residential project which will act as a <br />catalyst for the North Harbor Project Area, as well as an attraction <br />for new business to the area. He pointed out that both ownership <br />and rental housing opportunities will be provided by this new <br />development. He called the attention of the Agency Members to the <br />site map and showed them that it was necessary that the subject <br />property be acquired for inclusion in the project since it provides <br />ingress and egress from First Street, via Susan Street, to the <br />development site. He stated that the owners, pursuant to Government <br />Code 7267.2, had been offered just compensation for their property <br />as established by an independent appraiser. <br /> <br />In response to questions from Agency Members Acosta and Pulido, the' <br />Real Estate Manager stated that the property owner was asking <br />approximately three times the fair market value, according to the <br />appraisal, and that staff has been unable to obtain the data upon <br />which the property owner is basing his valuation of his property. <br /> <br />The Agency Secretary affirmed to <br />written communications. <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />Chairman <br /> <br />there <br /> <br />no <br /> <br />that <br /> <br />were <br /> <br />Chairman Young then asked if there was anyone present to speak in <br />favor of or against the proposed eminent domain action. There was <br />no response. He then stated that if there are no further questions, <br />comments or dicussion as to whether the public interest and <br />necessity require the proposed project, whether the project is <br />planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with <br />the greatest public good and least private injury, whether the <br />property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project, or <br />whether an offer has been made to the owner of record, then the <br />public hearing was' closed and a motion to adopt Resolution No. 87-05 <br />was in order. <br /> <br />Agency Member <br />Agency adopt <br />REDEVELOPMENT <br />DIRECTING THE <br />PURPOSES IN <br />ANA, STATE OF <br />(3225 WEST <br /> <br />It was moved by Vice Chairman McGuigan, seconded by <br />Pulido and carried unanimously (7:0) that the <br />Resolution No. 87-05: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY <br />AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING AND <br />CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPMENT <br />THE RIVERVIEW REDEVELOPMENT SITE IN THE CITY OF SANTA <br />CALIFORNIA, AND DECLARING THE PUBLIC NECESSITY THEREFOR <br />FIRST STREET). <br /> <br />FUND TRANSFER FOR THE SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION AND IMPROVEMENT FUND <br />(APPROPRIATIONS ADJUSTMENT NO. 92) <br /> <br />It was moved by Agency Member Griset, seconded by Agency Member Hart <br />and carried unanimously (7:0) that the Agency approve the repayment <br /> <br />8. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.