1979-52 CRA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

EJC:sc 10/2/79 RESOLUTION NO. 79-52 . A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND WARREN K. VAN INGEN AND PETE VAN RUITEN AND MARY VAN RUITEN FOR THE SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE SANTA ANA REDEVELOP- MENT PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana has prepared an Initial Study of the environmental impact of the proposed Participation Agreement between the Agency and Warren K. Van Ingen and Pete Van Ruiten and Mary Van Ruiten; and WHEREAS, the Agency has reviewed and considered the above said Initial Study and the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana Redevelopment Project, hereinafter referred to as the "Redevelopment Project"; and . WHEREAS, it appears on the basis of the Initial Study that the environmental impact of the proposed Agreement is essen- tially the same as in the previous Environmental Impact Report; and that there is no additional information or data available requiring supplementation of the previous Environmental Impact Report; and WHEREAS, said Initial Study conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code, Section 2l00 et ~), the "Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970," as amended, adopted by the Secretary for Resources of the State of California, and the procedures for implementation of the Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as adopted by Resolution No. 75-4 of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY REDEVEL- OPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS: . The Agency hereby finds and determines that: l, Neither the approval nor the implementation of the . proposed Agreement will cause substantial changes in the Redevel- opment Project, or with respect to the circumstances under which the Redevelopment Project is to be undertaken, which will require major revisions in the Environmental Impact Report previously adopted for the Redevelopment Project due to the involvement of new environmental impacts not covered in said previous Environ- mental Impact Report. . 2. No new information of substantial importance to the Redevelopment Project has become available which shows that the project to be undertaken pursuant to said Agreement will have one or more significant effects not discussed previously in the Environ- mental Impact Report; or that significant effects previously examined will be more severe than shown in the Environmental Impact Report; or that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Redevelopment proj- ect; or that mitigation measures or alternatives which were not previously considered in the Environmental Impact Report would substantially lessen one or more significant effects on the environ- ment. 3 lð.