1979-01 CRA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, , RESOLUTION NO. 79-1 . A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA MAKING ENVIRON- MENTAL FINDINGS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED PARTI- CIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA A,N D DR. STEVEN J. KEISER AND PAULA B. KEISER FOR THE SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE SANTA ANA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana has prepared an Initial Study of the environmental impact of the proposed Participation Agreement between the Agency and Dr. Steven J. Keiser and Paula B. Keiser; and WHEREAS, the Agency has reviewed and considered the above said Initial Study and the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Agency has found on the basis of the Initial Study that the environmental impact of the proposed Agreement is . essentially the same as in the previous Environmental Impact Report; and that there is no additional information or data available re- quiring supplementation of the previous Environmental Impact Report; and WHEREAS, said Initial Study conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.), the "Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970", as amended, adopted by the Secretary for Resources of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 adopted by resolution of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, AS FOLLOWS: The Agency hereby finds and determines that: 1. Neither the approval nor the implementation of the proposed Agreement will cause substantial changes in the Redevelopment Project, or with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is to be undertaken, which will require major revisions in the Environmental . Impact Reports previously adopted for the Project due to the involve- ment of new environmental impacts not covered in said previous Environmental Impact Reports. 2. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available which shows that the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed previously in the Environmental Impact Report; or that significant effects previously examined will be more severe than shown in the Environ~ental Impact Report; or that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or that mitigation measures or alternatives which were not previously considered in the Environmental Impact Report would substantially lessen one or more significant effects on the environment. . 57J 7!