|
ORGANIZATION OF AGENCY/COUNCIL
<br />SEATING ARRANGEMENTS OF CM & CA
<br />
<br />REMAIN THE SAME
<br />
<br />the City Manager and City Attorney remain
<br />in the Council Chambers.
<br />
<br />Following discussion of the memo
<br />dated May 1, 1981, by Mayor
<br />Bricken, decision was made by
<br />unanimous informal consent that
<br />seated at their regular location
<br /> CA 80
<br />
<br />BOARDS & COMMISSIONS APPTS. Following discussion of the memo
<br />CONT'D TO MAY 18, 1981 dated April 27, 1981, by Council-
<br /> member Acosta, decision was made
<br /> by unanimous informal consent to
<br />continue consideration of the proposal that Board and Commission appoint-
<br />merits run concurrently with councilmanic terms to May 18, 1981, pending
<br />analysis by the City Manager and City Attorney of the ramifications of
<br />implementing such a policy. CA 80.9
<br />
<br />POLICY ON TRAVEL BY CITY OFFICIALS Following discussion of the memo
<br />REFFERED TO CM dated April 28, 1981, by Mayor
<br /> Bricken, decision was made by
<br /> unanimous informal consent to
<br />refer to the City Manager preparation of a policy for out-of-town travel by
<br />Councilme~ers (including the Mayor), City Manager, City Clerk, and City
<br />Attorney. CA 65.14
<br />
<br />SEISMIC SAFETY ORDINANCE Joe Gilmaker, 308 West Fourth St.,
<br />REFERRED TO SEISMIC SAFETY urged Council to proceed with
<br />STUDY COMMITTEE investigation of the Seismic Safety
<br /> Ordinance requirements and stated
<br />that an extension of the time frames was in order. Followin~ discussion,
<br />MOTION was made by Luxembourger, seconded by Serrato, to: 1) refer the
<br />citizen inputs from the public meeting of April 22, 1981, on the City's
<br />Seismic Ordinance to the Council-appointed Seismic Safety Study Committee
<br />for review and report back on possible changes and recommendations at the
<br />Council meeting of July 6, 1981; and 2) exercise the wording in the ordinance
<br />to delay the various time frames until the recommendations of the Committee
<br />can be reviewed by the Council.
<br />
<br />Motion passed on the following vote:
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />
<br />NOES:
<br />ABSENT:
<br />
<br />Acosta, Bricken, Griset, Luxembourger, Markel,
<br /> McGuigan, Serrato
<br />None
<br />None
<br />
<br />CA 78.3h
<br />
<br />JUNIPER STREET RAILROAD GRADE Following discussion, MOTION was
<br />CROSSING NEGATIVE DECLARATION made by Luxembourger, seconded by
<br />APPROVED & FILED Acosta, to approve and file the
<br /> Negative Declaration for a new
<br />Juniper Street/Southern Pacific Railroad crossing, and direct staff to pro-
<br />ceed with efforts to insure Public Utilities Commission approval of the
<br />proposed crossing.
<br />
<br />Motion passed on the following vote:
<br />
<br />AYES: Acosta, Bricken, Griset, Luxembourger, Markel,
<br /> McGuigan, Serrato
<br />NOES: None
<br />ABSENT:None
<br />
<br />CA 29.12
<br />
<br />ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTION Following discussion, MOTION was
<br />AREAS - AUTHORIZED made by Luxembourger, seconded by
<br /> Acosta, to authorize designation
<br /> of three Economic Development
<br />Areas for the purpose of study, contained in the report dated April 24, 1981,
<br />prepared by the Community Development Director.
<br />
<br />Motion passed on the following vote:
<br />
<br />AYES:
<br />
<br />NOES:
<br />ABSENT:
<br />
<br />Acosta, Bricken, Griset, Luxembourger, Markel,
<br /> McGuigan, Serrato
<br />None
<br />None
<br />
<br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
<br />
<br />152
<br />
<br />MAY 4, 1981
<br />
<br />
<br />
|