My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
JT75C - 200 E. 1ST AMERICAN WAY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
04/04/2005
>
JT75C - 200 E. 1ST AMERICAN WAY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:56:48 PM
Creation date
3/30/2005 12:13:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75C
Date
4/4/2005
Destruction Year
2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />(2) The FAA considered and analyzed the impact <br />on all existing and planned public-use airports, <br />military airports and aeronautical facilities. <br /> <br />(3) The FAA considered and analyzed the <br />cumulative impact resulting from the proposed <br />structure when combined with the impact of <br />other existing or proposed structures. <br /> <br />(4) The ALUC "considers and recognizes the FAA <br />as the single 'Authority' for analyzing project <br />impact on airport or aeronautical operations, or <br />navigational-aid siting, including interference <br />with navigation-aids or published flight paths <br />and procedures." AELUP, 9 2.1.3, Page 14. <br /> <br />e) A Tom Krause Aviation Consulting report entitled <br />Geneva Commons Aviation Impact Analysis, <br />Instrument Approach, Departure Procedure and VRF <br />Analysis of John Wayne Airport (hereinafter "Krause <br />Analysis") concluded that the project would not pose <br />an adverse impact on any Instrument Approach <br />Procedures, Departure Procedures or VFR <br />Procedures at JWA. (Attached hereto as Exhibit B.) <br /> <br />f) Based on the FAA's Aeronautical Study, the Krause <br />Analysis, and the lack of factual evidence by JW A or <br />the ALUC to the contrary, the proposed project: <br /> <br />(1) Is not a hazard to air navigation. <br /> <br />(2) Does not raise the ceiling or visibility minimums <br />at JW A for an existing or planned instrument <br />procedure. <br /> <br />(3) Does not result in a loss of JWA's utility. <br /> <br />(4) Does not conflict with the VFR air space use <br />for the JW A traffic pattern or for en route <br />navigation to and from JW A. <br /> <br />g) Therefore, based upon the above, this project is <br />consistent with the safe operations, both existing and <br />proposed, of JWA. Since JWA has no adopted plans <br />for expansion of JWA within the next twenty years, <br />this project is consistent with the long-range <br />development of JW A. <br /> <br />75C-284 <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2005- <br />Page 9 of 25 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.