Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 4 <br />December 18, 2003 <br /> <br />Executive Officer Golding stated that the JW A noise expert considers grOlU1d level noise to be higher <br />due to reflection, and she assured Commissioner Webb that staff would reconullend Inconsistency if the <br />project had not met the ABLUP's "technical" requirements. She noted the ALUe's experience during <br />the 1980s with the Hutton Center development interfering with the FAA's VOR navaid at]W A. She <br />acknowledged the members' recently expressed interest in the topic, especially cell phone proliferation <br />and she suggested thnt more infonnation can be sought from FAA regarding the current project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Propst described nonna! and Santa Ana Willds operations at JW A, expressing his <br />concern with aircraft executing a Runway OIL Missed Approach toward the project site, including the <br />aircraft noise that will be generated. He described his experience of such events when living in 'Tustin, <br />stated his doubts ,vith FAA's answer on this issue, and repeated his view that the project is a bad <br />location for residential. <br /> <br />Commissioner O'Malley asked that the ALUC get comments on these issues from a professional <br />organization such as ALP A. <br /> <br />The Chairman replied to Commissioner H. Beverburg that the ALUC is engaged in figuring out its legal <br />options regarding a decision. <br /> <br />Executive Officer Golding atld Staff Analyst Brady explained that, in this case, the FAA did not <br />circulate the 7460 Notice to professionally-interested parties such as JW A, since '(the proposal is in an <br />area. of structures of similar height." Mr. Brady described the areas in Costa Mesa. Irvine, and Newport <br />Beach where similar buildings exist and the distances to them from the project site. <br /> <br />Commissioner Webb asked to hear from the applicant or the City's staff as to why this project is <br />desirable for future residents. <br /> <br />Mr. Franco Mola, project developer, described his lengthy experience locally and the changes that the <br />County and City are undergOing. He reviewed the projecfs history, beginning as a large high-rise <br />commercial development of nearly four million square feet around 1987. He noted the numerous high- <br />rise buildings that are closer to the freeway, including Hutton Center, and recited the extensive CEQA <br />work required by the City for his project. He assured the members that adequate physical sound <br />attenuation will be provided even though the proj eot is not in the JW A noise footprint. He reported that <br />the site was entitled for a large office building of a similar height around 1988. He noted the project <br />architect's presence to address questions, and asked the members to consider the overall development of <br />the area, stressing that he is not proposing to add a potential catastrophe, and offered to ans\ver any <br />questions, <br /> <br />Commissioner Campbell questioned Mr. Mola about reported construction problems with certain of his <br />residentia.l and commercial projects in Seal Beach and Huntington Beach. She related critical testimony <br />on physical problems with buildings and described the emotional atld [mancial impacts on those <br />residents. Commissioner Campbell said that based on her previous experience with. the developer's <br />projects, she could not support this project. <br /> <br />Nil. Mola stated that he is unaware of problems with the bank building named by the Commissioner, nor <br />that he knows where she obtained her information, stressing that he is present to discuss the current <br />proj ect on the Agenda. <br /> <br />2/S'd <br /> <br />L178'OH <br /> <br />t'KIISSIW~'JO:::) 3sn m~tfl .lCJOdCJltI <br />75C-161 <br /> <br />~'.JdS 1 : 1 S002 . 22 . CJtJt.-1 <br /> <br />