My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2005-04-04
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
04/04/2005
>
FULL PACKET_2005-04-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:56:30 PM
Creation date
3/30/2005 12:16:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br /> <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br /> <br />APRIL 4, 2005 <br />TITLE: <br /> <br />APPROVED <br /> <br />o As Recommended <br />o As Amended <br />o Ordinance on 1 sl Reading <br />o Ordinance on 2nd Reading <br />o Implementing Resolution <br />o Set Public Hearing For <br /> <br />AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING <br />SERVICES WITH METCALF & EDDY <br /> <br /> <br />CONTINUED TO <br /> <br />FILE NUMBER <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> <br />Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and <br />the Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with Metcalf & Eddy in <br />the amount of $152,513 plus a contingency of $15,000 for a total project <br />amount not to exceed $167,513 for design of the West Pump Station <br />Facilities Upgrade Project. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />In October 2004, the City was awarded an Environmental Protection Agency <br />(EPA) federal grant for improvements to the City's West Pump Station <br />Facility, (Exhibit 1). The improvements will consist of constructing a <br />pump building, replacing the booster pumps, motors, and appurtenances, <br />and installing all new electrical equipment and instrumentation. <br /> <br />Requests for Proposal to prepare plans, specifications and cost estimates <br />were sent to six engineering firms . Five responses were received and <br />evaluated on technical merit by a four-member selection committee. Two <br />of the firms received passing scores of 70 or higher. Listed below are <br />the scores and proposed fees of these two firms. <br /> <br />FIRM <br /> <br />Metcalf & Eddy <br />Lee & Ro Inc. <br /> <br />SCORE <br /> <br />88 <br />82 <br /> <br />FEE <br /> <br />$152,513 <br />$179,912 <br /> <br />Staff recommends that Metcalf & Eddy be retained for this project. They <br />were the top ranked firm based on technical merit and submitted the <br />lowest cost proposal. Their proposal demonstrated that the firm has <br />extensive experience with similar projects, a good understanding of the <br />project goals and objectives, and a strong project team. <br /> <br />25F-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.